Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LOG-4676: Modify receiverport to be a simple int instead of a struct #2215

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2023

Conversation

syedriko
Copy link
Contributor

Description

ReceiverPort is defined as a complex struct which mimics the need of defining a port for a generic service. The CLO controls all aspects of the receiver so it should need to have this complexity; users should only need to define potentially the port upon which to listen. Modify the API and code to convert 'receiverPort' into an int

/cc @alanconway
/assign @jcantrill

Links

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Oct 17, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 17, 2023

@syedriko: This pull request references LOG-4676 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.8.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Description

ReceiverPort is defined as a complex struct which mimics the need of defining a port for a generic service. The CLO controls all aspects of the receiver so it should need to have this complexity; users should only need to define potentially the port upon which to listen. Modify the API and code to convert 'receiverPort' into an int

/cc @alanconway
/assign @jcantrill

Links

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@jcantrill jcantrill left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good except one question. also please run "make docs"

@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 17, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jcantrill, syedriko

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 17, 2023
@syedriko syedriko force-pushed the syedriko-log-4676 branch 2 times, most recently from 9697dfc to 711a102 Compare October 17, 2023 22:11
@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

/test functional-target

@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 18, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 18, 2023

@syedriko: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit c575aae into openshift:master Oct 18, 2023
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release/5.8
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants