Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LOG-5572: Update obs conditions to meet enhancement #2518

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 30, 2024

Conversation

jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR:

  • modifies the obs status spec to meet the enhancement doc
  • Makes status a list of conditions to allow use of console annotations

Links

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/LOG-5572

cc @vparfonov @Clee2691 @cahartma

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label May 28, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented May 28, 2024

@jcantrill: This pull request references LOG-5572 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "4.8.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Description

This PR:

  • modifies the obs status spec to meet the enhancement doc
  • Makes status a list of conditions to allow use of console annotations

Links

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/LOG-5572

cc @vparfonov @Clee2691 @cahartma

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jcantrill jcantrill added release/6.0 and removed jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. labels May 28, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 28, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jcantrill

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 28, 2024
@@ -14,10 +14,6 @@ limitations under the License.

package v1

import (
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

only the declaration of constants remained in this file

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct. For now I'm certain these are still required. The re-definitions follows the pattern recommended for API conditions and allows us to use the existing kube types

@Clee2691
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 30, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 30, 2024

@jcantrill: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit c937b40 into openshift:master May 30, 2024
7 checks passed
@jcantrill jcantrill deleted the log5572 branch May 30, 2024 17:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release/6.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants