[release-4.9] Bug 2011798: Prometheus when installed on the cluster shouldn't have failing rules evaluation #1418

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2021-10-07T12:05:02Z

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1401

/assign raptorsun

openshift-ci · 2021-10-07T12:05:16Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 2006561 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 2011798. Retitling PR to link against new bug.
/retitle [release-4.9] Bug 2011798: Prometheus when installed on the cluster shouldn't have failing rules evaluation

In response to this:

[release-4.9] Bug 2006561: Prometheus when installed on the cluster shouldn't have failing rules evaluation

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-07T12:05:26Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2011798, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
dependent bug Bugzilla bug 2006561 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
dependent Bugzilla bug 2006561 targets the "4.10.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.10.0
bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @juzhao

In response to this:

[release-4.9] Bug 2011798: Prometheus when installed on the cluster shouldn't have failing rules evaluation

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

simonpasquier · 2021-10-07T13:04:01Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci · 2021-10-07T13:04:56Z

@simonpasquier: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2011798, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

simonpasquier · 2021-10-07T13:05:48Z

I've changed the target release of the BZ to 4.9.z since it isn't needed for 4.9 GA.

simonpasquier · 2021-10-11T13:55:59Z

/lgtm

openshift-ci · 2021-10-11T13:56:29Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, simonpasquier

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [simonpasquier]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-bot · 2021-10-11T14:14:40Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-11T14:26:40Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-11T15:14:38Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-11T15:52:55Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-11T16:27:35Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-11T16:51:48Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-11T17:03:37Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-11T17:28:38Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-11T18:07:37Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-12T15:03:53Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-12T15:29:52Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

simonpasquier · 2021-10-12T15:36:49Z

/skip

openshift-bot · 2021-10-12T16:34:55Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-13T01:01:01Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-13T01:01:06Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2011798, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

simonpasquier · 2021-10-13T11:54:25Z

/label backport-risk-assessed

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T01:01:09Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-14T01:01:13Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2011798, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

raptorsun · 2021-10-14T08:00:50Z

/bugzilla refresh

…

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 3:01 AM openshift-ci[bot] ***@***.***> wrote: @openshift-bot <https://github.com/openshift-bot>: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2011798 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011798>, which is invalid: - expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug. In response to this <#1418 (comment)> : /bugzilla refresh Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here <https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md>. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra <https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:> repository. — You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1418 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABOC3AHWFS4YHMTW2KMBJMLUGYTWJANCNFSM5FRD2IKQ> .

openshift-ci · 2021-10-14T08:00:54Z

@raptorsun: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2011798, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 3:01 AM openshift-ci[bot] @.***>
wrote:

@openshift-bot https://github.com/openshift-bot: This pull request
references Bugzilla bug 2011798
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011798, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets
"4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the
Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a
different bug.

In response to this
#1418 (comment)
:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here
https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md. If
you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an
issue against the kubernetes/test-infra
https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:
repository.

—
You are receiving this because you were assigned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#1418 (comment),
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABOC3AHWFS4YHMTW2KMBJMLUGYTWJANCNFSM5FRD2IKQ
.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-15T01:00:57Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-15T01:01:01Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2011798, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

sdodson · 2021-10-15T18:08:04Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci · 2021-10-15T18:08:11Z

@sdodson: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2011798, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.9.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.z)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
dependent bug Bugzilla bug 2006561 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
dependent Bugzilla bug 2006561 targets the "4.10.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.10.0
bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @juzhao

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-16T00:16:26Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-16T00:28:22Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-16T02:41:22Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-16T03:19:31Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-16T05:02:31Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-16T05:14:30Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-16T10:17:52Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/versions	`d57b31b`	link	false	`/test versions`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node	`d57b31b`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-single-node`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-16T10:26:31Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-16T10:38:33Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-16T11:57:47Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator#1418

Bugzilla bug 2011798 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

[release-4.9] Bug 2011798: Prometheus when installed on the cluster shouldn't have failing rules evaluation

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

fix bug#2004585

d57b31b

openshift-ci bot assigned raptorsun Oct 7, 2021

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Oct 7, 2021

Bug 2006561: Prometheus when installed on the cluster shouldn't have failing rules evaluation #1401

Merged

2 tasks

openshift-ci bot changed the title ~~[release-4.9] Bug 2006561: Prometheus when installed on the cluster shouldn't have failing rules evaluation~~ [release-4.9] Bug 2011798: Prometheus when installed on the cluster shouldn't have failing rules evaluation Oct 7, 2021

openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 7, 2021

openshift-ci bot requested review from juzhao, fpetkovski and sthaha October 7, 2021 12:05

openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 7, 2021

openshift-ci bot assigned simonpasquier Oct 11, 2021

openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Oct 11, 2021

openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Oct 13, 2021

openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 15, 2021

sdodson added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Oct 15, 2021

openshift-merge-robot merged commit ca5d3fa into openshift:release-4.9 Oct 16, 2021

[release-4.9] Bug 2011798: Prometheus when installed on the cluster shouldn't have failing rules evaluation #1418

[release-4.9] Bug 2011798: Prometheus when installed on the cluster shouldn't have failing rules evaluation #1418

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Oct 7, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 7, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 7, 2021

simonpasquier commented Oct 7, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 7, 2021

simonpasquier commented Oct 7, 2021

simonpasquier commented Oct 11, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 12, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 12, 2021

simonpasquier commented Oct 12, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 12, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 13, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 13, 2021

simonpasquier commented Oct 13, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 14, 2021

raptorsun commented Oct 14, 2021 via email

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 15, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 15, 2021

sdodson commented Oct 15, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 15, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 16, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 16, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 16, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 16, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 16, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 16, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 16, 2021 • edited

openshift-bot commented Oct 16, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 16, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 16, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 16, 2021 •

edited