[release-4.9] Bug 2012029: Allow namespace label in metric allow list #1422

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2021-10-08T03:38:37Z

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1421

/assign slashpai

Signed-off-by: Jayapriya Pai <janantha@redhat.com>

openshift-ci · 2021-10-08T03:38:51Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 2011698 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 2012029. Retitling PR to link against new bug.
/retitle [release-4.9] Bug 2012029: Allow namespace label in metric allow list

In response to this:

[release-4.9] Bug 2011698: Allow namespace label in metric allow list

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-08T03:39:00Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2012029, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
dependent bug Bugzilla bug 2011698 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
dependent Bugzilla bug 2011698 targets the "4.10.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.10.0
bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @juzhao

In response to this:

[release-4.9] Bug 2012029: Allow namespace label in metric allow list

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

slashpai · 2021-10-08T04:05:45Z

/approve

/assign @simonpasquier

slashpai · 2021-10-08T08:44:22Z

/retest-required

fpetkovski · 2021-10-08T09:26:19Z

/lgtm

openshift-bot · 2021-10-08T09:27:44Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-08T10:05:49Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-08T10:18:47Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-08T11:49:45Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-08T12:15:46Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-08T13:20:55Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-08T14:12:47Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-08T15:04:05Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-08T16:17:04Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-08T16:26:27Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/versions	`6928424`	link	false	`/test versions`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-08T16:41:03Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-14T01:01:11Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2012029, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T02:34:01Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T02:47:19Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T02:59:37Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T03:12:35Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T04:49:34Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T05:37:34Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T06:13:33Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T07:13:35Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

arajkumar · 2021-10-14T07:40:11Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci · 2021-10-14T07:40:15Z

@arajkumar: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2012029, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T08:13:38Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T08:38:34Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T09:02:33Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T09:14:35Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T09:26:34Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T09:38:35Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T10:27:41Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T10:40:34Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T11:04:37Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T11:56:35Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T12:51:48Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T13:28:51Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T13:40:51Z

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

simonpasquier · 2021-10-14T13:42:52Z

/skip

openshift-ci · 2021-10-14T14:15:03Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator#1422

Bugzilla bug 2012029 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

[release-4.9] Bug 2012029: Allow namespace label in metric allow list

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

slashpai added 2 commits October 8, 2021 03:38

jsonnet: Allow namespace label in KSM

7e1d7a5

Signed-off-by: Jayapriya Pai <janantha@redhat.com>

assets: regenerate

6928424

Signed-off-by: Jayapriya Pai <janantha@redhat.com>

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Oct 8, 2021

Bug 2011698: Allow namespace label in metric allow list #1421

Merged

2 tasks

openshift-ci bot assigned slashpai Oct 8, 2021

openshift-ci bot changed the title ~~[release-4.9] Bug 2011698: Allow namespace label in metric allow list~~ [release-4.9] Bug 2012029: Allow namespace label in metric allow list Oct 8, 2021

openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 8, 2021

openshift-ci bot requested review from juzhao, bison and fpetkovski October 8, 2021 03:39

openshift-ci bot assigned simonpasquier Oct 8, 2021

openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 8, 2021

openshift-ci bot assigned fpetkovski Oct 8, 2021

openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 8, 2021

openshift-merge-robot merged commit f1c2496 into openshift:release-4.9 Oct 14, 2021

[release-4.9] Bug 2012029: Allow namespace label in metric allow list #1422

[release-4.9] Bug 2012029: Allow namespace label in metric allow list #1422

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Oct 8, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 8, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 8, 2021

slashpai commented Oct 8, 2021

slashpai commented Oct 8, 2021

fpetkovski commented Oct 8, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 8, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 8, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 8, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 8, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 8, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 8, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 8, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 8, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 8, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 8, 2021 • edited

openshift-bot commented Oct 8, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

arajkumar commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

simonpasquier commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 8, 2021 •

edited