Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MON-3215: drop techpreview gate for collection profiles #2046

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rexagod
Copy link
Member

@rexagod rexagod commented Jul 18, 2023

  • I added CHANGELOG entry for this change.
  • No user facing changes, so no entry in CHANGELOG was needed.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jul 18, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 18, 2023

@rexagod: This pull request references MON-3215 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

  • I added CHANGELOG entry for this change.
  • No user facing changes, so no entry in CHANGELOG was needed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rexagod
Copy link
Member Author

rexagod commented Jul 18, 2023

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 18, 2023

@rexagod: This pull request references MON-3215 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rexagod rexagod force-pushed the MON-3215 branch 3 times, most recently from 154cfe6 to c99feb9 Compare July 19, 2023 07:08
@@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ const (
type Config struct {
Images *Images `json:"-"`
RemoteWrite bool `json:"-"`
TechPreview bool `json:"-"`
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have metrics-server PR also using same config so I think we can still keep this config and drop the check only for collection profile?

@@ -190,7 +189,7 @@ func (cps CollectionProfiles) String() string {
return sb.String()
}

func NewConfig(content io.Reader, tp bool) (*Config, error) {
func NewConfig(content io.Reader) (*Config, error) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same comment above regarding metrics-server

// some features are only meant for TechPreview.
func NewConfigFromString(content string, tp bool) (*Config, error) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same comment above regarding metrics-server

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 28, 2023
@simonpasquier
Copy link
Contributor

I agree with @slashpai to keep the TP bool because it will be reusable in the future.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 31, 2023
@slashpai
Copy link
Member

slashpai commented Nov 7, 2023

/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Dec 8, 2023
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 7, 2024

@openshift-bot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Jan 7, 2024
@rexagod
Copy link
Member Author

rexagod commented Feb 28, 2024

/reopen

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot reopened this Feb 28, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2024

@rexagod: Reopened this PR.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 28, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rexagod

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 28, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 28, 2024

@rexagod: This pull request references MON-3215 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

  • I added CHANGELOG entry for this change.
  • No user facing changes, so no entry in CHANGELOG was needed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 28, 2024
@rexagod rexagod force-pushed the MON-3215 branch 2 times, most recently from 7b7b30e to 21591fd Compare February 28, 2024 20:53
@rexagod
Copy link
Member Author

rexagod commented Feb 29, 2024

/retest

1 similar comment
@rexagod
Copy link
Member Author

rexagod commented Mar 5, 2024

/retest

Signed-off-by: Pranshu Srivastava <rexagod@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 11, 2024

@rexagod: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/versions 6d6895e link false /test versions
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview 6d6895e link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@rexagod
Copy link
Member Author

rexagod commented Mar 28, 2024

  • Replace TP with FG.

@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
# Note: This CHANGELOG is only for the monitoring team to track all monitoring related changes. Please see OpenShift release notes for official changes.

## 4.16

- [#2046](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator/pull/2046) Drop TechPreview gate for CollectionProfiles.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IIUC we added this as a TechPreviewNoUpgrade FeatureGate so for this PR there is no user change log?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK, the TP was replaced by the newly introduced ways of using feature-gates in #2153. At the moment there is no changelog entry for this, but we might want to point out to users that this is available in TP behind a certain FG if they want to use it. WDYT?

@rexagod
Copy link
Member Author

rexagod commented Mar 28, 2024

/close
#2046 (comment) was addressed in #2153. Reopen when (and if) we want to drop the feature-gate entirely (after this is enabled by default).

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Mar 28, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 28, 2024

@rexagod: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

/close
#2046 (comment) was addressed in #2153. Reopen when (and if) we want to drop the feature-gate entirely (after this is enabled by default).

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants