Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AUTH-481: add PSa labels to openshift-user-workload-monitoring namespace #2256

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

liouk
Copy link
Member

@liouk liouk commented Feb 7, 2024

  • I added CHANGELOG entry for this change.
  • No user facing changes, so no entry in CHANGELOG was needed.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Feb 7, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 7, 2024

@liouk: This pull request references AUTH-481 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

  • I added CHANGELOG entry for this change.
  • No user facing changes, so no entry in CHANGELOG was needed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@machine424
Copy link
Contributor

As it's the default profile
/lgtm
to be more explicit.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 7, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 7, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: liouk, machine424

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 7, 2024
@liouk liouk marked this pull request as draft February 7, 2024 12:00
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 7, 2024
@liouk
Copy link
Member Author

liouk commented Feb 13, 2024

/hold
blocked by https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AUTH-482

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 13, 2024
@liouk liouk marked this pull request as ready for review February 13, 2024 09:25
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 13, 2024
@simonpasquier
Copy link
Contributor

/skip
/retest-required

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 14, 2024

@liouk: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/versions 2f1cf44 link false /test versions
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-operator 2f1cf44 link true /test e2e-agnostic-operator

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants