Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MON-808] add ignoreNamespaceSelectors field #520

Merged

Conversation

pgier
Copy link
Contributor

@pgier pgier commented Oct 23, 2019

Prevents service and pod monitors from selecting namespaces other than
their own.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 23, 2019
@s-urbaniak
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Oct 23, 2019
Prevents service and pod monitors from selecting namespaces other than
their own.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 23, 2019
@pgier
Copy link
Contributor Author

pgier commented Oct 23, 2019

rebased to fix bindata conflict

@s-urbaniak
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 23, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pgier, s-urbaniak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@lilic
Copy link
Contributor

lilic commented Oct 23, 2019

/retest

@paulfantom
Copy link
Contributor

nit: Could we not include manually changed and generated stuff in the same commit, but split them into 2?

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a8285a3 into openshift:master Oct 23, 2019
@pgier
Copy link
Contributor Author

pgier commented Oct 23, 2019

@paulfantom yeah, that makes sense, it would make the actual changes more clear and easier to rebase. I'll do that in the future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants