Bug 1954773: update the cno to use the egressfirewall flag #1095
Conversation
openshift-ci
bot
added
bugzilla/severity-high
|
@JacobTanenbaum: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1954773, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (anusaxen@redhat.com), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
do-not-merge/hold
|
@alexanderConstantinescu don't we want to merge this first, and then the ovnkube bits? becuase otherwise ovnkube won't have egress firewall enabled until the CNO PR merges, and presumably we test that in CI and thus it would break? |
We don't test egress firewall in CI. So in any case we have nothing to worry about :) The reason I put a hold on it was because I thought ovnkube errors if you provide it a flag it doesn't recognize (my memory might not serve me right on this one though...), which would then make it CrashLoop and block CI. |
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
|
/retest |
|
|
|
/hold cancel |
openshift-ci
bot
removed
the
do-not-merge/hold
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: alexanderConstantinescu, JacobTanenbaum, squeed The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
approved
|
/retest |
|
/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade |
|
@squeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of squeed: ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
4 similar comments
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
20 similar comments
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
@JacobTanenbaum: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
@JacobTanenbaum: An error was encountered checking the state of a related pull request at ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes#2192 for bug 1954773 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details. Full error message.
Get "http://ghproxy/repos/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/pulls/2192": failed to get installation id for org ovn-org: the github app is not installed in organization ovn-org
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
ovn-kubernetes has changed to use a flag to enable egressFirewall, the cno needs to use that flag