Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1984049: Slow OVN Recovery on SNO #1159

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 11, 2021

Conversation

flavio-fernandes
Copy link
Contributor

Adding template OVN_DB_PROBE_INITIAL_DELAY parameter, which will set to 0 when there is only one master node.

Signed-off-by: Flavio Fernandes flaviof@redhat.com

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 20, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 20, 2021

@flavio-fernandes: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1984049, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (anusaxen@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

WIP: Bug 1984049: Slow OVN Recovery on SNO

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jul 20, 2021
@flavio-fernandes flavio-fernandes force-pushed the bug1984049 branch 2 times, most recently from 567a2dd to 096af3b Compare July 20, 2021 21:59
@flavio-fernandes flavio-fernandes changed the title WIP: Bug 1984049: Slow OVN Recovery on SNO Bug 1984049: Slow OVN Recovery on SNO Jul 20, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 20, 2021
@flavio-fernandes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@flavio-fernandes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@@ -82,6 +82,11 @@ func renderOVNKubernetes(conf *operv1.NetworkSpec, bootstrapResult *bootstrap.Bo
data.Data["OVN_NB_DB_LIST"] = dbList(bootstrapResult.OVN.MasterIPs, OVN_NB_PORT)
data.Data["OVN_SB_DB_LIST"] = dbList(bootstrapResult.OVN.MasterIPs, OVN_SB_PORT)
data.Data["OVN_DB_CLUSTER_INITIATOR"] = bootstrapResult.OVN.ClusterInitiator
if len(bootstrapResult.OVN.MasterIPs) == 1 {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As pointed out in the bug dispatch meeting, we seem to be doing this "len(bootstrapResult.OVN.MasterIPs)" call multiple times in the function. Ref: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1154/commits
Maybe we should convert it ti a local variable?

@flavio-fernandes
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebasing to PR 1154 to remove duplicate logic in determining the number of masters.

@flavio-fernandes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @flavio-fernandes

@abhat
Copy link
Contributor

abhat commented Jul 22, 2021

/retest

2 similar comments
@flavio-fernandes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@flavio-fernandes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@knobunc
Copy link
Contributor

knobunc commented Jul 28, 2021

/retest
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Jul 28, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 2, 2021
@flavio-fernandes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@flavio-fernandes flavio-fernandes force-pushed the bug1984049 branch 3 times, most recently from 6d8b671 to 070a3c2 Compare August 3, 2021 19:27
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

22 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 11, 2021

@flavio-fernandes: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn cb2bde7 link /test e2e-vsphere-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-ovn-ipsec-step-registry cb2bde7 link /test e2e-ovn-ipsec-step-registry
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn cb2bde7 link /test e2e-openstack-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6-ipsec cb2bde7 link /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6-ipsec
ci/prow/e2e-ovn-step-registry cb2bde7 link /test e2e-ovn-step-registry
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade cb2bde7 link /test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit 1fb2149 into openshift:master Aug 11, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 11, 2021

@flavio-fernandes: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1984049 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1984049: Slow OVN Recovery on SNO

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants