Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1987046: Add pre-puller ds to reduce upgrade downtime #1167

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 28, 2021

Conversation

tssurya
Copy link
Contributor

@tssurya tssurya commented Jul 28, 2021

Manual Cherry-pick of #1141
Fixed conflicts due to #1145

cc @vrutkovs

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 28, 2021

@tssurya: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Add pre-puller ds to reduce upgrade downtime

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

/retitle Bug 1987046: Add pre-puller ds to reduce upgrade downtime

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title Add pre-puller ds to reduce upgrade downtime Bug 1987046: Add pre-puller ds to reduce upgrade downtime Jul 28, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 28, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 28, 2021

@tssurya: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1987046, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.8.z" release, but it targets "4.9.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1987046: Add pre-puller ds to reduce upgrade downtime

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jul 28, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 28, 2021

@vrutkovs: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1987046, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.8.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.8.z)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1970985 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1970985 targets the "4.9.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.9.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (anusaxen@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jul 28, 2021
@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

/retest

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

Still seeing a lot of disruption:

Jul 29 09:12:38.430: Frontends were unreachable during disruption for at least 26m6s of 1h21m25s (32%):
Jul 29 09:12:38.430: Service was unreachable during disruption for at least 13m53s of 1h19m35s (17%):

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

/retest

1 similar comment
@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

/retest

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

Ultimately I think the best fix for this is that we do "pull through" caching in the registry instead of having each node pull each container.

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Aug 9, 2021

Still seeing a lot of disruption:

Jul 29 09:12:38.430: Frontends were unreachable during disruption for at least 26m6s of 1h21m25s (32%):
Jul 29 09:12:38.430: Service was unreachable during disruption for at least 13m53s of 1h19m35s (17%):

This solution of prepull is not perfect. The fact that there is disruption for 26 minutes cannot be solely due to OVN-K. It must be a combo of dependent components restarting during upgrades?

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Aug 9, 2021

Ultimately I think the best fix for this is that we do "pull through" caching in the registry instead of having each node pull each container.

I don't know how that would look, but then again on prod's I don't know if the registries will be co-located? This PR doesn't do much alongside a run in CI (not sure how the CI setup looks like), but in larger envs, we expect more benefit.

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

vrutkovs commented Aug 9, 2021

It must be a combo of dependent components restarting during upgrades?

The only difference between e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade and e2e-gcp-upgrade is OVN-K

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Aug 24, 2021

@vrutkovs : Should we get this fix in into 4.8? Or do we think we need a new fix to solve the service disruption issue and close this?

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

I think this fix would be nice in 4.8, but clearly its not sufficient to fix all disruptions

@abhat
Copy link
Contributor

abhat commented Aug 25, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 25, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 25, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abhat, tssurya

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 25, 2021
@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Aug 26, 2021

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-azure-ovn-dualstack

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jupierce
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@jupierce jupierce added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Aug 27, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

4 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 28, 2021

@tssurya: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-dualstack c013bb0 link /test e2e-azure-ovn-dualstack

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

8 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c750237 into openshift:release-4.8 Aug 28, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 28, 2021

@tssurya: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1987046 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1987046: Add pre-puller ds to reduce upgrade downtime

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants