Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1997050: Fix panic with unknown networks #1188

Conversation

errordeveloper
Copy link
Contributor

@errordeveloper errordeveloper commented Aug 25, 2021

Make sure Bootstrap() returns an empty struct instead of a nil, and the unit test matches reality. Breakage was introduced in 403c4ff.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. label Aug 25, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 25, 2021

@errordeveloper: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1997050, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1997050: Fix panic with unknown networks

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 25, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 25, 2021

Hi @errordeveloper. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Aug 25, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 25, 2021

@errordeveloper: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1997050, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1997050: Fix panic with unknown networks

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Make sure `Bootstrap()` returns an empty struct instead of a nil,
and the unit test matches reality. Breakage was introduced in 403c4ff.
@errordeveloper errordeveloper force-pushed the fix-unknown-network-render-panic branch from 8e8b647 to 0d9f70f Compare August 25, 2021 09:24
@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test
/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 25, 2021

@vrutkovs: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1997050, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (weliang@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/ok-to-test
/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Aug 25, 2021
@errordeveloper
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-ovn-hybrid-step-registry
/test e2e-aws-sdn-multi

@errordeveloper
Copy link
Contributor Author

errordeveloper commented Aug 25, 2021

To me it looks like all these test failures are unrelated to the changes...

Copy link
Contributor

@alexanderConstantinescu alexanderConstantinescu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To me it looks like all these test failures are unrelated to the changes...

Yes, seems like general CI flakiness. Given that this fixes your issue and does not impact the CNO in any way:

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 25, 2021
@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

/retest

@squeed
Copy link
Contributor

squeed commented Aug 25, 2021

/approve
good catch!

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 25, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alexanderConstantinescu, errordeveloper, squeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 25, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 25, 2021

@vrutkovs: An error was encountered querying GitHub for users with public email (weliang@redhat.com) for bug 1997050 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. Post "http://ghproxy/graphql": dial tcp 172.30.229.2:80: i/o timeout

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

9 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

/hold

e2e-agnostic-update is permafailing, needs an override

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 26, 2021
@squeed
Copy link
Contributor

squeed commented Aug 31, 2021

/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade
/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 31, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 31, 2021

@squeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of squeed: ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade
/hold cancel

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

/retest

@dougbtv
Copy link
Member

dougbtv commented Aug 31, 2021

/retest-required

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

4 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 31, 2021

@errordeveloper: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn 0d9f70f link /test e2e-azure-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade 0d9f70f link /test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

vrutkovs commented Sep 1, 2021

/skip
/retest

@squeed
Copy link
Contributor

squeed commented Sep 1, 2021

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
this PR clearly doesn't affect that.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 1, 2021

@squeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of squeed: ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
this PR clearly doesn't affect that.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 7ed6dce into openshift:master Sep 1, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 1, 2021

@errordeveloper: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1997050 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1997050: Fix panic with unknown networks

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@errordeveloper errordeveloper deleted the fix-unknown-network-render-panic branch September 1, 2021 12:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants