New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-17380: ipsec: fix oopsy from 2e3fc8e7a0 #1996
Conversation
this fixes OCPBUGS-17380
it is better to verify traffic. status will only fail if it's not running, whereas counting the traffic also tells us if something is configured or not()
the previous names were confusing. ovn-ipsec-containerized - will be used as long as libreswan is not on the host ovn-ipsec-host - will be used if libreswan was deployed (for north-south) in both cases, the daemonset is used for e-w traffic (but in 2 different ways) see commit 8961f43 for more info
/approve |
/retitle: OCPBUGS-17380 ipsec: fix oopsy from 2e3fc8e |
/retitle OCPBUGS-17380 ipsec: fix oopsy from 2e3fc8e |
/jira refresh |
@trozet: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retitle OCPBUGS-17380: ipsec: fix oopsy from 2e3fc8e |
@yuvalk: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17380, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/jira refresh |
@trozet: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17380, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dcbw, trozet, yuvalk The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@yuvalk: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
619ceff
into
openshift:master
@yuvalk: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17380: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17380 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.14 |
@dcbw: new pull request created: #1997 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
this fixes OCPBUGS-17380
this include