OCPBUGS-29572: Apply hypershift cluster-profile for ibm-cloud-managed

[tssurya]

We need good developer docs in CNO so that other teams can contribute properly; its a maze today

Helping out with #2277 since that bot PR had a red verify lane.

Context:

Since HyperShift / Hosted Control Plane have adopted include.release.openshift.io/ibm-cloud-managed, to tailor the resources of clusters running in the ROKS IBM environment, the include.release.openshift.io/hypershift addition will allow Hypershift to express different profile choices than ROKS

Credit to @ashwindasr who has worked behind the scenes and is driving this effort from ART side.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tssurya
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign jacobtanenbaum for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci-robot]

@tssurya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29572, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
• bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @zhaozhanqi

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

We need good developer docs in CNO so that other teams can contribute properly; its a maze today

Helping out with #2277 since that bot PR had a red verify lane.

Context:

Since HyperShift / Hosted Control Plane have adopted include.release.openshift.io/ibm-cloud-managed, to tailor the resources of clusters running in the ROKS IBM environment, the include.release.openshift.io/hypershift addition will allow Hypershift to express different profile choices than ROKS

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@tssurya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29572, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @zhaozhanqi

In response to this:

We need good developer docs in CNO so that other teams can contribute properly; its a maze today

Helping out with #2277 since that bot PR had a red verify lane.

Context:

Since HyperShift / Hosted Control Plane have adopted include.release.openshift.io/ibm-cloud-managed, to tailor the resources of clusters running in the ROKS IBM environment, the include.release.openshift.io/hypershift addition will allow Hypershift to express different profile choices than ROKS

Credit to @ashwindasr who has worked behind the scenes and is driving this effort from ART side.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[ashwindasr]

/retest

[ashwindasr]

/retest

[ashwindasr]

/retest

[ashwindasr]

/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6

[ashwindasr]

/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6

[openshift-ci]

@tssurya: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/security	b769052	link	false	/test security
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6	b769052	link	false	/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6
ci/prow/4.16-upgrade-from-stable-4.15-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade	b769052	link	true	/test 4.16-upgrade-from-stable-4.15-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[tssurya]

@kyrtapz : PTAL, I think you mentioned some concerns over this PR right? cc @ashwindasr

[kyrtapz]

@kyrtapz : PTAL, I think you mentioned some concerns over this PR right? cc @ashwindasr

Thanks for the ping. So I have two concerns:

• Some of the changed files are vendored in from the API, why can't we add the annotation directly in the API repo? @ashwindasr
• We need to update the hack/update-codegen.sh script so it doesn't overwrite the changes in this pr

[ashwindasr]

Thanks @kyrtapz

Working on the API changes, which are a bit more complicated. So once thats in, we can adjust and back port.

/hold