Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1879854: Bump vendor dependencies to k8s 1.19.0 #154

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Sep 21, 2020

Conversation

jmencak
Copy link
Contributor

@jmencak jmencak commented Sep 17, 2020

Changes:

  • vendor dependencies to k8s 1.19.0
  • latest OpenShift and MCO dependencies
  • switch to golang 1.15
  • switched to controller-gen to generate/update CRDs; there is
    no longer a need to manually edit CRDs after they are generated

Changes:
  - vendor dependencies to k8s 1.19.0
  - latest OpenShift and MCO dependencies
  - switch to golang 1.15
  - switched to controller-gen to generate/update CRDs; there is
    no longer a need to manually edit CRDs after they are generated
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 17, 2020
Copy link

@kpouget kpouget left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Most of the changes look sane and match the comments in the commit message,
just for manifests/02-crd-profile.yaml, manifests/02-crd-tuned.yaml, could you confirm that the changes (paragraph filling and order of properties) come from the change of the tool used to generate it?

@jmencak
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmencak commented Sep 17, 2020

Most of the changes look sane and match the comments in the commit message,
just for manifests/02-crd-profile.yaml, manifests/02-crd-tuned.yaml, could you confirm that the changes (paragraph filling and order of properties) come from the change of the tool used to generate it?

Thanks for the review, much appreciated! Yes, they come from the tool. That was actually the point to have this fully automated. I've also checked that the yamls semantically match.

@jmencak jmencak changed the title Bump vendor dependencies to k8s 1.19.0 Bug 1879854: Bump vendor dependencies to k8s 1.19.0 Sep 17, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 17, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jmencak: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1879854, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1879854: Bump vendor dependencies to k8s 1.19.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jmencak
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmencak commented Sep 17, 2020

/test e2e-aws-upgrade

@jmencak
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmencak commented Sep 17, 2020

/test e2e-aws
/test e2e-aws-operator

@jmencak
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmencak commented Sep 17, 2020

/joke

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jmencak: Past, present, and future walked into a bar.... It was tense.

In response to this:

/joke

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jmencak
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmencak commented Sep 17, 2020

/test e2e-aws-upgrade
/test e2e-aws
Fingers crossed.

@jmencak
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmencak commented Sep 17, 2020

/test e2e-aws
@kpouget this is the last test to push through the CI. Have I covered all your concerns? If so, could I have this PR with a LGTM label? Thanks!

@kpouget
Copy link

kpouget commented Sep 17, 2020

/lgtm
Thanks Jiri for the PR :)

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 17, 2020
@jmencak
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmencak commented Sep 17, 2020

/uncc @dagrayvid
/uncc @kpouget
/joke
/test e2e-aws

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jmencak: I thought my wife was joking when she said she'd leave me if I didn't stop signing "I'm A Believer"... Then I saw her face.

In response to this:

/uncc @dagrayvid
/uncc @kpouget
/joke
/test e2e-aws

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the request for review from dagrayvid September 17, 2020 17:39
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jmencak
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmencak commented Sep 17, 2020

/test e2e-aws

1 similar comment
@jmencak
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmencak commented Sep 17, 2020

/test e2e-aws

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jmencak
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmencak commented Sep 18, 2020

/test e2e-aws

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Makefile Show resolved Hide resolved
manifests/02-crd-tuned.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jmencak
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmencak commented Sep 18, 2020

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 18, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 18, 2020
@jmencak
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmencak commented Sep 18, 2020

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 18, 2020
@jmencak
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmencak commented Sep 19, 2020

All checks succeeded. A way to generate CRD automatically by approved binaries will be done in a follow-up PR.

@kpouget
Copy link

kpouget commented Sep 21, 2020

@sttts's concern with the YAML file has been addressed AFAIU, and his concern with the CRD generator will be addressed in a follow-up PR, so I think all the concern are resolved.

/lgtm

thanks Jiri

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 21, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jmencak, kpouget

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@sttts
Copy link

sttts commented Sep 21, 2020

Sgtm.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 8b9aeed into openshift:master Sep 21, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jmencak: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1879854 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1879854: Bump vendor dependencies to k8s 1.19.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jmencak jmencak deleted the 4.6-k8s-1.19 branch September 21, 2020 10:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants