Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-4.13][manual] OCPBUGS-11851: render: remove uid from render-sync target (#594) #609

Merged

Conversation

ffromani
Copy link
Contributor

The render command is generating manifests with uid now. we don't need it to be part of the data for our render-expected-output so let's remove it

The render command is generating manifests with uid now.
we don't need it to be part of the data for our render-expected-output
so let's remove it

Signed-off-by: Talor Itzhak <titzhak@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 11, 2023

@ffromani: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.13][manual] render: remove uid from render-sync target (#594)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 11, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ffromani

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 11, 2023
@ffromani
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-pao

known issue

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 11, 2023

@ffromani: Overrode contexts on behalf of ffromani: ci/prow/e2e-gcp-pao

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-pao

known issue

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ffromani
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

Copy link
Contributor

@jmencak jmencak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM apart from minor nits.

@@ -9,4 +9,8 @@ _output/cluster-node-tuning-operator render \
--asset-output-dir "${ARTIFACT_DIR}"

cp "${ARTIFACT_DIR}"/* "${WORKDIR}"/test/e2e/performanceprofile/testdata/render-expected-output
for f in "${WORKDIR}"/test/e2e/performanceprofile/testdata/render-expected-output/*
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: two spaces between in "${WOR

@@ -9,4 +9,8 @@ _output/cluster-node-tuning-operator render \
--asset-output-dir "${ARTIFACT_DIR}"

cp "${ARTIFACT_DIR}"/* "${WORKDIR}"/test/e2e/performanceprofile/testdata/render-expected-output
for f in "${WORKDIR}"/test/e2e/performanceprofile/testdata/render-expected-output/*
do
sed -i "s/uid:.*/uid: \"\"/" "${f}"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: For some, I believe sed -i 's/uid:.*/uid: ""/' "${f}" would be easier to read.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AFAIR using single quotes (') ignores regex this is why we use double quotes (") here

@ffromani
Copy link
Contributor Author

LGTM apart from minor nits.

Since this is a manual backport I can fix master branch first and then update this PR I guess

@jmencak
Copy link
Contributor

jmencak commented Apr 11, 2023

LGTM apart from minor nits.

Since this is a manual backport I can fix master branch first and then update this PR I guess

I think I can live with the current state.
/lgtm
Please unhold when ready.
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 11, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 11, 2023
@ffromani
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

thanks Jiri. Unholding since we missing required labels anyway

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 11, 2023
@yanirq
Copy link
Contributor

yanirq commented Apr 16, 2023

@ffromani we will need a bug to get this merged

@Tal-or
Copy link
Contributor

Tal-or commented Apr 16, 2023

/retitle [release-4.13][manual] OCPBUGS-11851: render: remove uid from render-sync target (#594)

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.13][manual] render: remove uid from render-sync target (#594) [release-4.13][manual] OCPBUGS-11851: render: remove uid from render-sync target (#594) Apr 16, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 16, 2023

@ffromani: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.13][manual] OCPBUGS-11851: render: remove uid from render-sync target (#594)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Apr 16, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ffromani: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-11851, which is invalid:

  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-11851 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.14.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

The render command is generating manifests with uid now. we don't need it to be part of the data for our render-expected-output so let's remove it

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 16, 2023
@Tal-or
Copy link
Contributor

Tal-or commented Apr 16, 2023

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 16, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Tal-or: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-11851, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.13.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.13.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-11852 is in the state MODIFIED, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-11852 targets the "4.14.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.14.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @gsr-shanks

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 16, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from gsr-shanks April 16, 2023 13:49
@yanirq
Copy link
Contributor

yanirq commented Apr 16, 2023

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Apr 16, 2023
@Tal-or
Copy link
Contributor

Tal-or commented Apr 16, 2023

@ffromani we will need a bug to get this merged

@yanirq Done. I had to create bug for 4.14 as well, but I think we can mark it as verified, let me know what you think.

@yanirq
Copy link
Contributor

yanirq commented Apr 16, 2023

@mrniranjan please review for the cherrypick approve label

@mrniranjan
Copy link
Contributor

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Apr 18, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 41f9751 and 2 for PR HEAD 288f938 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 553336b and 1 for PR HEAD 288f938 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD ee7a7ab and 0 for PR HEAD 288f938 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

Revision 288f938 was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 19, 2023
@Tal-or
Copy link
Contributor

Tal-or commented Apr 23, 2023

depends on #604 which fixes the broken e2e-gcp-pao-updating-profile lane

@Tal-or
Copy link
Contributor

Tal-or commented May 11, 2023

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 11, 2023
@Tal-or
Copy link
Contributor

Tal-or commented May 11, 2023

/test e2e-gcp-pao-updating-profile

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD fa37e0c and 2 for PR HEAD 288f938 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 2ca6eee and 1 for PR HEAD 288f938 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD ec8a631 and 0 for PR HEAD 288f938 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

Revision 288f938 was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 18, 2023
@Tal-or
Copy link
Contributor

Tal-or commented May 24, 2023

/retest

@ffromani
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel
/retest-required

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 31, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 6cb324b and 2 for PR HEAD 288f938 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD bc8d1ab and 1 for PR HEAD 288f938 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 1, 2023

@ffromani: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit fdc0840 into openshift:release-4.13 Jun 1, 2023
11 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ffromani: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-11851: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-11851 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

The render command is generating manifests with uid now. we don't need it to be part of the data for our render-expected-output so let's remove it

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants