Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: perfprof: devices: fix default test image #672

Merged

Conversation

ffromani
Copy link
Contributor

@ffromani ffromani commented Jun 1, 2023

The new test image gained compatibility with SRIOV device plugin >= 4.13

The new test image gained compatibility with SRIOV device plugin >= 4.13

Signed-off-by: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from dagrayvid and Tal-or June 1, 2023 10:54
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 1, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ffromani

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 1, 2023
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ const (

// note NO DEFAULT for targetNode - intentionally
sriovDeviceResourceNameDefault = "openshift.io/dpdk_nic_1"
workloadContainerImageDefault = "quay.io/fromani/devaccess:2023051001" // FIXME
workloadContainerImageDefault = "quay.io/fromani/devaccess:2023060101" // FIXME
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR. Are we generally fine using images from private registries ("fromani") in the tests?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no we're not. I'm bending the rules, this is barely OK, but I don't have the capacity to do anything better atm.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see. Thanks for clarifying.

@shajmakh
Copy link
Contributor

shajmakh commented Jun 1, 2023

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 1, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD d30c5cc and 2 for PR HEAD 77fe0d9 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 606c1b7 and 1 for PR HEAD 77fe0d9 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 19, 2023

@ffromani: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit d338d51 into openshift:master Jun 19, 2023
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants