Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[release-4.6] Bug 1996051: bindata: run openshift-apiserver as root explicitly. #469

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 17, 2021
Merged

[release-4.6] Bug 1996051: bindata: run openshift-apiserver as root explicitly. #469

merged 1 commit into from Sep 17, 2021

Conversation

s-urbaniak
Copy link
Contributor

@s-urbaniak s-urbaniak commented Aug 20, 2021 •
edited

This is a manual cherry-pick of #465

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@s-urbaniak: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1996051, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.6.z" release, but it targets "4.9.0" instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960680 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is MODIFIED instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960680 to target a release in 4.7.0, 4.7.z, but it targets "4.9.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1996051: bindata: run openshift-apiserver as root explicitly.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 20, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from mfojtik and sttts August 20, 2021 12:36
@s-urbaniak s-urbaniak changed the title Bug 1996051: bindata: run openshift-apiserver as root explicitly. [release-4.6] Bug 1996051: bindata: run openshift-apiserver as root explicitly. Aug 20, 2021
@s-urbaniak
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@s-urbaniak: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1996051, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960680 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is MODIFIED instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960680 to target a release in 4.7.0, 4.7.z, but it targets "4.9.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@s-urbaniak
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@s-urbaniak: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1996051, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1996045 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is NEW instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-4.6] Bug 1996051: bindata: run openshift-apiserver as root explicitly.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@s-urbaniak: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1996051, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1996045 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is NEW instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Aug 20, 2021

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Aug 20, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 21, 2021

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1996051, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1996045 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is NEW instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

6 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 24, 2021

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1996051, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1996045 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is NEW instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 25, 2021

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1996051, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1996045 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is NEW instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 25, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Sep 16, 2021
@mfojtik
Copy link
Member

mfojtik commented Sep 16, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 16, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 16, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mfojtik, s-urbaniak, sttts

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 17, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 17, 2021

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1996051, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.z)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1996045 is in the state CLOSED (ERRATA), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1996045 targets the "4.7.z" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.7.0, 4.7.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @xingxingxia

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 17, 2021
@hardys
Copy link

hardys commented Sep 17, 2021

[patch-manager] Approving for cherry-pick with score 0.50

@hardys hardys added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Sep 17, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit b428bbd into openshift:release-4.6 Sep 17, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 17, 2021

@s-urbaniak: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1996051 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

[release-4.6] Bug 1996051: bindata: run openshift-apiserver as root explicitly.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mfojtik mfojtik Awaiting requested review from mfojtik

@sttts sttts Awaiting requested review from sttts

@xingxingxia xingxingxia Awaiting requested review from xingxingxia

Assignees

@mfojtik mfojtik

@sttts sttts

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
6 participants
@s-urbaniak @sttts @openshift-bot @mfojtik @hardys @openshift-merge-robot