enable sample imagestreams and templates on Z #225

gabemontero · 2020-01-20T15:19:47Z

No description provided.

gabemontero · 2020-01-20T23:57:23Z

/retest

gabemontero · 2020-01-21T12:23:46Z

/retest

gabemontero · 2020-01-21T17:36:21Z

/test e2e-aws-operator
/test e2e-aws-image-ecosystem

gabemontero · 2020-01-21T20:37:34Z

/test e2e-aws-jenkins

gabemontero · 2020-01-21T21:17:07Z

need openshift/origin#24434 for e2e-aws-jenkins

gabemontero · 2020-01-23T01:49:50Z

/test e2e-aws-jenkins

gabemontero · 2020-01-24T01:10:02Z

/test e2e-aws-jenkins

gabemontero · 2020-01-24T18:12:48Z

ok @pweil- @bparees @adambkaplan @ausil @yselkowitz here is my original version of the unlock s390/ppc commit (which I had pointed @yselkowitz to), along with the s390x/ppc64le content from openshift/library which we just merged/processed

We can either use this PR (associating it with @yselkowitz's BZs to facilitate backports) or he can duplicate this in his.

Per our meeting, placing a

/hold

on this until we get the comeback on the test coverage.

In the interim, I'll monitor the e2e's in case any non-CI flakes/issues occur.

gabemontero · 2020-01-24T18:15:59Z

/test unit

tmp/build/library-sync.sh

test/e2e/cluster_samples_operator_test.go

gabemontero · 2020-01-24T19:25:09Z

/test unit

pkg/stub/handler.go

gabemontero · 2020-01-24T22:05:54Z

/test e2e-aws-operator

gabemontero · 2020-01-26T17:42:29Z

/retest

gabemontero · 2020-01-26T20:35:35Z

/test e2e-aws-operator

gabemontero · 2020-01-26T22:34:52Z

/test e2e-aws-jenkins

gabemontero · 2020-01-27T00:34:25Z

ok finally got a clean jenkins install, but of course are now running into the need for openshift/origin#24448

gabemontero · 2020-01-30T22:47:42Z

/retest

openshift-bot · 2020-06-20T12:33:03Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

gabemontero · 2020-06-20T13:01:55Z

in ci-flake cycle ... pulling out of merge queue, try to let CI settle

/hold

gabemontero · 2020-06-20T13:02:21Z

/test e2e-aws-builds
/test e2e-aws-jenkins

gabemontero · 2020-06-20T15:28:14Z

/retest

gabemontero · 2020-06-20T18:57:16Z

@akram @waveywaves it looks like one of the 3 changes between to 2 of you to
has broke pipeline_origin_bld.go again in 4.6 / master branch since I fixed it last month.

Perhaps related to you all trying to get the test passing in earlier versions of OCP (4.2 / 4.3 / 4.4) ?

/hold cancel

gabemontero · 2020-06-20T18:57:31Z

/override e2e-aws-builds

gabemontero · 2020-06-20T18:57:46Z

/override e2e-aws-jenkins

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-06-20T18:57:49Z

@gabemontero: /override requires a failed status context to operate on.
The following unknown contexts were given:

e2e-aws-builds

Only the following contexts were expected:

ci/prow/e2e-aws
ci/prow/e2e-aws-builds
ci/prow/e2e-aws-image-ecosystem
ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator
ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade
ci/prow/images
ci/prow/unit
tide

In response to this:

/override e2e-aws-builds

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-06-20T18:57:49Z

@gabemontero: /override requires a failed status context to operate on.
The following unknown contexts were given:

e2e-aws-builds

Only the following contexts were expected:

ci/prow/e2e-aws
ci/prow/e2e-aws-builds
ci/prow/e2e-aws-image-ecosystem
ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator
ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade
ci/prow/images
ci/prow/unit
tide

In response to this:

/override e2e-aws-builds

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-06-20T18:58:03Z

@gabemontero: /override requires a failed status context to operate on.
The following unknown contexts were given:

e2e-aws-jenkins

Only the following contexts were expected:

ci/prow/e2e-aws
ci/prow/e2e-aws-builds
ci/prow/e2e-aws-image-ecosystem
ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator
ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade
ci/prow/images
ci/prow/unit
tide

In response to this:

/override e2e-aws-jenkins

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-06-20T18:58:03Z

@gabemontero: /override requires a failed status context to operate on.
The following unknown contexts were given:

e2e-aws-jenkins

Only the following contexts were expected:

ci/prow/e2e-aws
ci/prow/e2e-aws-builds
ci/prow/e2e-aws-image-ecosystem
ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator
ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade
ci/prow/images
ci/prow/unit
tide

In response to this:

/override e2e-aws-jenkins

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

gabemontero · 2020-06-20T18:58:37Z

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-builds
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins

gabemontero · 2020-06-20T19:00:26Z

everything else in e2e-aws-builds passed in the last run of it
plus, this PR is only updating s390x/ppc64le, hence no updates to the existing x86_64 templates/imagestreams

and had prior clean runs prior to the recent changes in https://github.com/openshift/jenkins-client-plugin/commits/master/examples/jenkins-image-sample.groovy

hence chose ot use override

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-06-20T19:01:14Z

@gabemontero: Overrode contexts on behalf of gabemontero: ci/prow/e2e-aws-builds, ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-builds
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-06-20T19:01:14Z

@gabemontero: Overrode contexts on behalf of gabemontero: ci/prow/e2e-aws-builds, ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-builds
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-jenkins

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

gabemontero · 2020-06-20T19:05:54Z

@akram @waveywaves last run with the client plugin issue was https://deck-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/view/gcs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_cluster-samples-operator/225/pull-ci-openshift-cluster-samples-operator-master-e2e-aws-builds/1274363517285175296

yselkowitz · 2020-06-24T17:29:02Z

/cherry-pick release-4.5

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-06-24T17:29:09Z

@yselkowitz: only openshift org members may request cherry picks. You can still do the cherry-pick manually.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-06-24T17:29:10Z

@yselkowitz: only openshift org members may request cherry picks. You can still do the cherry-pick manually.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

akram · 2020-06-24T17:31:29Z

ack @gabemontero

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-06-24T17:52:19Z

@gabemontero: An error was encountered updating to the MODIFIED state for bug 1850694 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

code 32000: Red Hat Bugzilla's database reported a query serialization error. Most likely this occurred because another user or process attempted to change the same data that you were attempting to change. Please press Back and retry the transaction.

 UPDATE bugs SET bug_status = ? WHERE bug_id = ? at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Object.pm line 544. Bugzilla::Object::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x55e857778910)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm line 1168 Bugzilla::Bug::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x55e857778910)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Bug.pm line 851 Bugzilla::WebService::Bug::update('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x55e856bdfb68)') called at (eval 2168) line 1 eval ' $procedure->{code}->($self, $params) ;' called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 208 JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x55e856bc8708)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 295 Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x55e856bc8708)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/REST.pm line 98 Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/rest.cgi line 30 ModPerl::ROOT::Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::var_www_html_bugzilla_rest_2ecgi::handler('Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x55e8571a2b78)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207 eval {...} called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207 ModPerl::RegistryCooker::run('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x55e8572e1240)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 173 ModPerl::RegistryCooker::default_handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x55e8572e1240)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/Registry.pm line 32 ModPerl::Registry::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x55e8571a2b78)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/mod_perl.pl line 139 Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x55e8571a2b78)') called at (eval 2168) line 0 eval {...} called at (eval 2168) line 0

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Bug 1850694: enable sample imagestreams and templates on Z

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-06-24T17:52:19Z

@gabemontero: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: . Bugzilla bug 1850694 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1850694: enable sample imagestreams and templates on Z

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 20, 2020

openshift-ci-robot requested review from adambkaplan and coreydaley January 20, 2020 15:20

openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 20, 2020

gabemontero force-pushed the more-s390 branch from 40b8099 to 25ff9dd Compare January 20, 2020 19:43

gabemontero force-pushed the more-s390 branch from 25ff9dd to 7ef85e0 Compare January 21, 2020 02:21

gabemontero force-pushed the more-s390 branch from 7ef85e0 to 768cc7b Compare January 21, 2020 15:48

gabemontero force-pushed the more-s390 branch from 768cc7b to 1c3e828 Compare January 24, 2020 18:07

openshift-ci-robot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 24, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 24, 2020

yselkowitz reviewed Jan 24, 2020

View reviewed changes

tmp/build/library-sync.sh Show resolved Hide resolved

tmp/build/library-sync.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

test/e2e/cluster_samples_operator_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved

gabemontero force-pushed the more-s390 branch from 1c3e828 to a352d7d Compare January 24, 2020 18:54

yselkowitz reviewed Jan 24, 2020

View reviewed changes

pkg/stub/handler.go Show resolved Hide resolved

openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 20, 2020

openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 20, 2020

gabemontero merged commit 0038cc3 into openshift:master Jun 20, 2020

gabemontero deleted the more-s390 branch June 20, 2020 19:01

yselkowitz mentioned this pull request Jun 24, 2020

Bug 1850683: Enable P&Z imagestreams in 4.5 #296

Merged

gabemontero changed the title ~~enable sample imagestreams and templates on Z~~ Bug 1850694: enable sample imagestreams and templates on Z Jun 24, 2020

gabemontero changed the title ~~Bug 1850694: enable sample imagestreams and templates on Z~~ enable sample imagestreams and templates on Z Jun 24, 2020

yselkowitz mentioned this pull request Jun 25, 2020

Bug 1792102: Install imagestreams and templates on Power and Z [4.4] #297

Merged

enable sample imagestreams and templates on Z #225

enable sample imagestreams and templates on Z #225

Conversation

gabemontero commented Jan 20, 2020

gabemontero commented Jan 20, 2020

gabemontero commented Jan 21, 2020

gabemontero commented Jan 21, 2020

gabemontero commented Jan 21, 2020

gabemontero commented Jan 21, 2020

gabemontero commented Jan 23, 2020

gabemontero commented Jan 24, 2020

gabemontero commented Jan 24, 2020

gabemontero commented Jan 24, 2020

gabemontero commented Jan 24, 2020

gabemontero commented Jan 24, 2020

gabemontero commented Jan 26, 2020

gabemontero commented Jan 26, 2020

gabemontero commented Jan 26, 2020

gabemontero commented Jan 27, 2020

gabemontero commented Jan 30, 2020

openshift-bot commented Jun 20, 2020

gabemontero commented Jun 20, 2020

gabemontero commented Jun 20, 2020

gabemontero commented Jun 20, 2020

gabemontero commented Jun 20, 2020

gabemontero commented Jun 20, 2020

gabemontero commented Jun 20, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 20, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 20, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 20, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 20, 2020

gabemontero commented Jun 20, 2020

gabemontero commented Jun 20, 2020 • edited

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 20, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 20, 2020

gabemontero commented Jun 20, 2020

yselkowitz commented Jun 24, 2020

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jun 24, 2020

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jun 24, 2020

akram commented Jun 24, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 24, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 24, 2020

gabemontero commented Jun 20, 2020 •

edited