Bug 1836032: Fix Jenkins Monitored templates typo and other updates #289

waveywaves · 2020-06-09T13:49:02Z

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-06-09T14:02:40Z

@waveywaves: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1836032, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1836032: Fix Jenkins Monitored templates typo and other updates

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-06-09T14:02:40Z

@waveywaves: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1836032, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1836032: Fix Jenkins Monitored templates typo and other updates

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

gabemontero · 2020-06-09T14:03:28Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-06-09T14:03:30Z

@gabemontero: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1836032, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "4.5.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-06-09T14:03:30Z

@gabemontero: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1836032, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.0" release, but it targets "4.5.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

gabemontero · 2020-06-09T14:04:32Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-06-09T14:04:35Z

@gabemontero: An error was encountered updating to the POST state for bug 1836032 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

code 32000: Red Hat Bugzilla's database reported a query serialization error. Most likely this occurred because another user or process attempted to change the same data that you were attempting to change. Please press Back and retry the transaction.

 UPDATE bugs SET bug_status = ? WHERE bug_id = ? at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Object.pm line 544. Bugzilla::Object::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x564a9ab9c328)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm line 1168 Bugzilla::Bug::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x564a9ab9c328)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Bug.pm line 851 Bugzilla::WebService::Bug::update('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x564a9ac55b48)') called at (eval 5770) line 1 eval ' $procedure->{code}->($self, $params) ;' called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 208 JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x564a9a691b80)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 295 Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x564a9a691b80)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/REST.pm line 98 Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/rest.cgi line 30 ModPerl::ROOT::Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::var_www_html_bugzilla_rest_2ecgi::handler('Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x564a9a163938)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207 eval {...} called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207 ModPerl::RegistryCooker::run('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x564a9a205478)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 173 ModPerl::RegistryCooker::default_handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x564a9a205478)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/Registry.pm line 32 ModPerl::Registry::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x564a9a163938)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/mod_perl.pl line 139 Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x564a9a163938)') called at (eval 5770) line 0 eval {...} called at (eval 5770) line 0

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-06-09T14:04:38Z

@gabemontero: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1836032, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

gabemontero · 2020-06-09T14:11:25Z

/lgtm

gabemontero · 2020-06-09T14:11:40Z

/cherrypick release-4.5

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-06-09T14:11:41Z

@gabemontero: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.5 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-06-09T14:11:41Z

@gabemontero: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.5 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-06-09T14:11:42Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gabemontero, waveywaves

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [gabemontero]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-bot · 2020-06-09T17:03:40Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-06-09T17:29:49Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-06-09T17:42:43Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-06-09T17:55:54Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

gabemontero · 2020-06-09T22:19:30Z

been spinning on CI flakes all day

/hold

for now

will check individual remaining e2e's either this evening or tommorrow

gabemontero · 2020-06-10T11:48:53Z

/test e2e-aws-builds

gabemontero · 2020-06-10T11:58:25Z

/hold cancel

gabemontero · 2020-06-10T12:43:45Z

build test completed successfully, but the artifacts gathering container failed

/retest

gabemontero · 2020-06-10T15:05:52Z

this time failed to acquire lease

/retest

openshift-bot · 2020-06-10T16:53:27Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-06-10T20:33:50Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-06-10T22:07:48Z

@waveywaves: An error was encountered updating to the MODIFIED state for bug 1836032 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

code 32000: Red Hat Bugzilla's database reported a query serialization error. Most likely this occurred because another user or process attempted to change the same data that you were attempting to change. Please press Back and retry the transaction.

 UPDATE bugs SET bug_status = ? WHERE bug_id = ? at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Object.pm line 544. Bugzilla::Object::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x564a9a6ee3a0)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm line 1168 Bugzilla::Bug::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x564a9a6ee3a0)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Bug.pm line 851 Bugzilla::WebService::Bug::update('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x564a9944ac78)') called at (eval 2019) line 1 eval ' $procedure->{code}->($self, $params) ;' called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 208 JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x564a99b69748)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 295 Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x564a99b69748)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/REST.pm line 98 Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/rest.cgi line 30 ModPerl::ROOT::Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::var_www_html_bugzilla_rest_2ecgi::handler('Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x564a9a0669a8)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207 eval {...} called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207 ModPerl::RegistryCooker::run('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x564a999ff090)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 173 ModPerl::RegistryCooker::default_handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x564a999ff090)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/Registry.pm line 32 ModPerl::Registry::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x564a9a0669a8)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/mod_perl.pl line 139 Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x564a9a0669a8)') called at (eval 2019) line 0 eval {...} called at (eval 2019) line 0

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Bug 1836032: Fix Jenkins Monitored templates typo and other updates

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-06-10T22:07:48Z

@waveywaves: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/jenkins#1055, openshift/cluster-samples-operator#289. Bugzilla bug 1836032 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1836032: Fix Jenkins Monitored templates typo and other updates

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-06-10T22:08:00Z

@gabemontero: failed to push cherry-picked changes in GitHub: pushing failed, output: "To https://github.com/openshift-cherrypick-robot/cluster-samples-operator\n ! [remote rejected] cherry-pick-289-to-release-4.5 -> cherry-pick-289-to-release-4.5 (cannot lock ref 'refs/heads/cherry-pick-289-to-release-4.5': reference already exists)\nerror: failed to push some refs to 'https://openshift-cherrypick-robot:CENSORED@github.com/openshift-cherrypick-robot/cluster-samples-operator'\n", error: exit status 1

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-06-10T22:08:01Z

@gabemontero: new pull request created: #291

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

akram · 2020-06-18T22:01:46Z

/cherrypick release-4.2

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-06-18T22:01:53Z

@akram: #289 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.2":

error: Failed to merge in the changes.
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
A	tmp/build/assets/operator/ocp-x86_64/jenkins/templates/jenkins-ephemeral-monitored.json
A	tmp/build/assets/operator/ocp-x86_64/jenkins/templates/jenkins-persistent-monitored.json
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging tmp/build/assets/operator/ocp-x86_64/jenkins/templates/jenkins-persistent.json
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in tmp/build/assets/operator/ocp-x86_64/jenkins/templates/jenkins-persistent.json
Auto-merging tmp/build/assets/operator/ocp-x86_64/jenkins/templates/jenkins-ephemeral.json
Patch failed at 0001 Fix Jenkins Monitored templates typo

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-06-18T22:01:54Z

@akram: #289 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.2":

error: Failed to merge in the changes.
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
A	tmp/build/assets/operator/ocp-x86_64/jenkins/templates/jenkins-ephemeral-monitored.json
A	tmp/build/assets/operator/ocp-x86_64/jenkins/templates/jenkins-persistent-monitored.json
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging tmp/build/assets/operator/ocp-x86_64/jenkins/templates/jenkins-persistent.json
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in tmp/build/assets/operator/ocp-x86_64/jenkins/templates/jenkins-persistent.json
Auto-merging tmp/build/assets/operator/ocp-x86_64/jenkins/templates/jenkins-ephemeral.json
Patch failed at 0001 Fix Jenkins Monitored templates typo

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

akram · 2020-06-22T16:44:46Z

/cherry-pick release-4.4
/cherry-pick release-4.3

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-06-22T16:44:55Z

@akram: failed to push cherry-picked changes in GitHub: pushing failed, output: "To https://github.com/openshift-cherrypick-robot/cluster-samples-operator\n ! [remote rejected] cherry-pick-289-to-release-4.4 -> cherry-pick-289-to-release-4.4 (cannot lock ref 'refs/heads/cherry-pick-289-to-release-4.4': reference already exists)\nerror: failed to push some refs to 'https://openshift-cherrypick-robot:CENSORED@github.com/openshift-cherrypick-robot/cluster-samples-operator'\n", error: exit status 1

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.4
/cherry-pick release-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-06-22T16:44:56Z

@akram: new pull request created: #294

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.4
/cherry-pick release-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

akram · 2020-06-22T16:56:20Z

/cherry-pick release-4.4

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-06-22T16:56:23Z

@akram: failed to push cherry-picked changes in GitHub: pushing failed, output: "To https://github.com/openshift-cherrypick-robot/cluster-samples-operator\n ! [rejected] cherry-pick-289-to-release-4.4 -> cherry-pick-289-to-release-4.4 (non-fast-forward)\nerror: failed to push some refs to 'https://openshift-cherrypick-robot:CENSORED@github.com/openshift-cherrypick-robot/cluster-samples-operator'\nhint: Updates were rejected because the tip of your current branch is behind\nhint: its remote counterpart. Integrate the remote changes (e.g.\nhint: 'git pull ...') before pushing again.\nhint: See the 'Note about fast-forwards' in 'git push --help' for details.\n", error: exit status 1

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-06-22T16:56:24Z

@akram: failed to push cherry-picked changes in GitHub: pushing failed, output: "To https://github.com/openshift-cherrypick-robot/cluster-samples-operator\n ! [rejected] cherry-pick-289-to-release-4.4 -> cherry-pick-289-to-release-4.4 (non-fast-forward)\nerror: failed to push some refs to 'https://openshift-cherrypick-robot:CENSORED@github.com/openshift-cherrypick-robot/cluster-samples-operator'\nhint: Updates were rejected because the tip of your current branch is behind\nhint: its remote counterpart. Integrate the remote changes (e.g.\nhint: 'git pull ...') before pushing again.\nhint: See the 'Note about fast-forwards' in 'git push --help' for details.\n", error: exit status 1

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

akram · 2020-06-22T16:56:35Z

/cherry-pick release-4.3

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-06-22T16:56:42Z

@akram: failed to push cherry-picked changes in GitHub: pushing failed, output: "To https://github.com/openshift-cherrypick-robot/cluster-samples-operator\n ! [remote rejected] cherry-pick-289-to-release-4.3 -> cherry-pick-289-to-release-4.3 (cannot lock ref 'refs/heads/cherry-pick-289-to-release-4.3': reference already exists)\nerror: failed to push some refs to 'https://openshift-cherrypick-robot:CENSORED@github.com/openshift-cherrypick-robot/cluster-samples-operator'\n", error: exit status 1

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-06-22T16:56:43Z

@akram: new pull request created: #295

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Fix Jenkins Monitored templates typo

e42d8f9

openshift-ci-robot requested review from adambkaplan, gabemontero and coreydaley June 9, 2020 13:49

gabemontero changed the title ~~Fix Jenkins Monitored templates typo and other updates~~ Bug 1836032: Fix Jenkins Monitored templates typo and other updates Jun 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot assigned gabemontero Jun 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Jun 10, 2020

openshift-merge-robot merged commit 4f18aab into openshift:master Jun 10, 2020

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Jun 10, 2020

[release-4.5] Bug 1846145: Fix Jenkins Monitored templates typo and other updates #291

Merged

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Jun 22, 2020

[release-4.4] Bug 1865889: Fix Jenkins Monitored templates typo and other updates #294

Merged

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Jun 22, 2020

[release-4.3] Bug 1852429: Fix Jenkins Monitored templates typo and other updates #295

Merged

Bug 1836032: Fix Jenkins Monitored templates typo and other updates #289

Bug 1836032: Fix Jenkins Monitored templates typo and other updates #289

Conversation

waveywaves commented Jun 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 9, 2020

gabemontero commented Jun 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 9, 2020

gabemontero commented Jun 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 9, 2020

gabemontero commented Jun 9, 2020

gabemontero commented Jun 9, 2020

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jun 9, 2020

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jun 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 9, 2020

openshift-bot commented Jun 9, 2020

openshift-bot commented Jun 9, 2020

openshift-bot commented Jun 9, 2020

openshift-bot commented Jun 9, 2020

gabemontero commented Jun 9, 2020

gabemontero commented Jun 10, 2020

gabemontero commented Jun 10, 2020

gabemontero commented Jun 10, 2020

gabemontero commented Jun 10, 2020

openshift-bot commented Jun 10, 2020

openshift-bot commented Jun 10, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 10, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 10, 2020

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jun 10, 2020

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jun 10, 2020

akram commented Jun 18, 2020

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jun 18, 2020

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jun 18, 2020

akram commented Jun 22, 2020

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jun 22, 2020

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jun 22, 2020

akram commented Jun 22, 2020

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jun 22, 2020

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jun 22, 2020

akram commented Jun 22, 2020

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jun 22, 2020

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jun 22, 2020