Bug 1872080: add new okd e2e to validate okd vs. ocp content is installed #318
Conversation
gabemontero
changed the title
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: gabemontero The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci-robot
added
approved
|
@gabemontero: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1872080, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
bugzilla/valid-bug
|
@gabemontero: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1872080, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
Looks good to me, thanks! |
|
/test e2e-aws-operator |
|
/test okd-e2e-aws-operator |
|
@vrutkovs okd-e2e-aws-operator is not going to pass here until this PR merges and then openshift/release#11340 merges at this point I just want to make sure e2e-aws-operator is OK .... e2e-aws-image-ecosystem is a nice to have then I'm either going to override okd-e2e-aws-operator or force merge |
Oh, I see, thanks |
|
ok did not break non-okd e2e's of note ... both operator and image eco are ok |
|
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws |
|
@gabemontero: Overrode contexts on behalf of gabemontero: ci/prow/e2e-aws In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade |
|
@gabemontero: Overrode contexts on behalf of gabemontero: ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/override ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws |
|
@gabemontero: Overrode contexts on behalf of gabemontero: ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/override ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-operator |
|
@gabemontero: Overrode contexts on behalf of gabemontero: ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-operator In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/override ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-upgrade |
|
@gabemontero: Overrode contexts on behalf of gabemontero: ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-upgrade In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@gabemontero: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged: These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Bugzilla bug in order for it to move to the next state. Bugzilla bug 1872080 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
A force merge or test override is likely needed since the okd-e2e-aws-operator job in openshift/release needs to validate against the new
make test-e2e-okd@vrutkovs @yselkowitz FYI
aside from the rehearsals in my openshift/release#11340, we'll validate against @yselkowitz 's #317 and the updated UBI8 based OKD content