Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correctly initialize service host and port when environment is missing #590

Merged

Conversation

arjunrn
Copy link
Contributor

@arjunrn arjunrn commented Jun 10, 2021

The init containers where not be correctly initialized with the service host and port. Also fixed tests.

Signed-off-by: Arjun Naik <arjun.rn@gmail.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from crawford and vrutkovs June 10, 2021 10:55
@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/hold

looks pretty straightforward (great find), leaving this for Jack to verify this just to be sure

/cc @jottofar

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 10, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from jottofar June 10, 2021 15:29
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jun 10, 2021
@jottofar
Copy link
Contributor

jottofar commented Jun 10, 2021

Haha, cut-and-paste strikes again. And then I guess the unit tests were made (or changed) such that they did not catch the issue.

/unhold

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 10, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: arjunrn, jottofar, vrutkovs

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jottofar
Copy link
Contributor

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 10, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

4 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit d73bfa6 into openshift:master Jun 15, 2021
@arjunrn arjunrn deleted the init-container-service-env branch June 15, 2021 08:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants