Simplify the comparison between SyncWork references #592
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Arjun Naik <arjun.rn@gmail.com>
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: arjunrn, jottofar The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci
bot
added
lgtm
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade |
|
@wking: Overrode contexts on behalf of wking: ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/test unit |
|
/override ci/prow/unit |
|
@wking: Overrode contexts on behalf of wking: ci/prow/unit In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
All green, flake rate is high, so Prow's batch jobs are unlikely to pass. Merging by hand to clear out our PR backlog. |
Increase readability of comparison between
*SyncWorkreferences.