New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bug 1772759: fix console operator panic when RouterCAValidationDegraded #355
bug 1772759: fix console operator panic when RouterCAValidationDegraded #355
Conversation
This reverts commit 9768455.
@benjaminapetersen: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1772759, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
pkg/console/starter/starter.go
Outdated
@@ -259,6 +242,9 @@ func RunOperator(ctx *controllercmd.ControllerContext) error { | |||
"Progressing", | |||
"Available", | |||
// "Faililng" | |||
// added in 4.3, can remove in 4.4, to ensure operators running 4.3.x are not wedged. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if this change is strictly necessary. These were new conditions with the router-ca sync commit within the 4.3 time frame, so if the code is not running in production we can ignore.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah not sure we need this change, if not would rather not add it...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would take this out, and we can backport the revert to 4.3.
@benjaminapetersen: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1772759, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
1 similar comment
@benjaminapetersen: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1772759, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/hold I'd remove the second commit |
pkg/console/starter/starter.go
Outdated
@@ -242,6 +242,9 @@ func RunOperator(ctx *controllercmd.ControllerContext) error { | |||
"Progressing", | |||
"Available", | |||
// "Faililng" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not for this PR, but it looks like we can remove these now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah we should eliminate.
311fc1f
to
963e90c
Compare
Removed the second commit. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/cherrypick release-4.3 |
@spadgett: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.3 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: benjaminapetersen, jhadvig, spadgett The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/hold cancel |
/bugzilla refresh |
@spadgett: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1772759, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
12 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@benjaminapetersen: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1772759 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@spadgett: new pull request created: #358 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Reverts router-ca changes in #328.
Not sure yet if this is the direction we want to go, considering openshift/enhancements#126.
I suspect that some of this code can return in a future PR. We will likely not need the
resource-syncer
, and instead will be able to annotate a newconfigmap
with the appropriaterouter-ca
annotation to get it injected like theproxy
. Then we can assess if it exists & mount in the deployment, or not./assign @spadgett @jhadvig