Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1975379: Use hard requirement for anti-affinity rules on both console's deployments #560

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jul 14, 2021

Conversation

jhadvig
Copy link
Member

@jhadvig jhadvig commented Jun 24, 2021

Use requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution for anti-affinity rules on both console's deployments.
The label selectors for console deployment will be:
"app": "console", "component": "ui"
The label selectors for downloads deployment will be:
"app": "console", "component": "downloads"

/assign @spadgett

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. label Jun 24, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 24, 2021

@jhadvig: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1975379, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1975379: Use hard requirement for anti-affinity rules on both console's deployments

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 24, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from bparees and spadgett June 24, 2021 16:23
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 24, 2021
@jhadvig
Copy link
Member Author

jhadvig commented Jun 24, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 24, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 24, 2021

@jhadvig: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1975379, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yapei

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from yapei June 24, 2021 16:47
@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/test ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 24, 2021

@spadgett: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger jobs:

  • /test e2e-agnostic-upgrade
  • /test e2e-aws-console
  • /test e2e-aws-operator
  • /test e2e-aws-single-node
  • /test e2e-gcp
  • /test images
  • /test unit
  • /test verify

Use /test all to run the following jobs:

  • pull-ci-openshift-console-operator-master-e2e-agnostic-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-console-operator-master-e2e-aws-console
  • pull-ci-openshift-console-operator-master-e2e-aws-operator
  • pull-ci-openshift-console-operator-master-e2e-gcp
  • pull-ci-openshift-console-operator-master-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-console-operator-master-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-console-operator-master-verify

In response to this:

/test ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/test e2e-aws-single-node

Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 24, 2021
@spadgett
Copy link
Member

Hm, looks like this prevents console rollout:

status:
  conditions:
  - lastProbeTime: null
    lastTransitionTime: "2021-06-24T16:59:02Z"
    message: '0/6 nodes are available: 3 node(s) didn''t match Pod''s node affinity/selector,
      3 node(s) didn''t match pod affinity/anti-affinity rules, 3 node(s) didn''t
      match pod anti-affinity rules.'
    reason: Unschedulable
    status: "False"
    type: PodScheduled
  phase: Pending

/lgtm cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 24, 2021
@spadgett
Copy link
Member

I have a feeling the problem is with rolling deployments since we'll have more than the normal number of replicas. If there are ever more than 3, they'll fail to schedule. We probably need to look at max surge and max unavailable if we want to make this a hard requirement.

@jhadvig
Copy link
Member Author

jhadvig commented Jun 28, 2021

@spadgett I've added additional commit that update podAntiAffinity rules and explicitly specifies deployment strategy and its maxSurge and maxUnavailability 🤞

@jhadvig
Copy link
Member Author

jhadvig commented Jun 29, 2021

/retest

2 similar comments
@spadgett
Copy link
Member

spadgett commented Jul 8, 2021

/retest

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

spadgett commented Jul 9, 2021

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 9, 2021

@jhadvig: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node cc5938b link /test e2e-aws-single-node

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/retest

Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 14, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 14, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jhadvig, spadgett

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit e6934ce into openshift:master Jul 14, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 14, 2021

@jhadvig: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1975379 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1975379: Use hard requirement for anti-affinity rules on both console's deployments

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants