New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-17948: Fix that Devconsole plugin show essential features like add page and topology also when Builds and DeploymentConfigs capabilities are disabled #13097
Conversation
@jerolimov: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17948, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/uncc abhinandan13jan karthikjeeyar |
@jerolimov: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17948, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
6e2c9e9
to
43bc29a
Compare
@jerolimov: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17948, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
Looks good to me :) |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
43bc29a
to
ebb89ad
Compare
@jerolimov: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17948, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@jerolimov: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17948, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@jerolimov: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17948, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
const openshiftPath = '/apis/apps.openshift.io/v1'; | ||
// This config API contains the OpenShift Project, and other mandatory resources | ||
const openshiftPath = '/apis/config.openshift.io/v1'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fyi: The old API group only contains the DeploymentConfig resource which isn't a good candidate to test if its a OpenShift cluster since it's optional starting with 4.14.
@jerolimov: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jerolimov, jhadvig The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@jerolimov: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17948: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17948 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Fix included in accepted release 4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-09-11-201102 |
Fix included in accepted release 4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-09-12-024050 |
Fix included in accepted release 4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-09-15-101929 |
Fixes:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-17948
Analysis / Root cause:
When Samples, Builds and DeploymentConfigs are disabled, the
OPENSHIFT
flag stays disabled.Solution Description:
Use different smaller feature flags for different resources instead of using one big flag for everything.
This is similar to #13089, I aligned the flag names to that PR, but both PRs could be merged separately!
OPENSHIFT_BUILDCONFIG
OPENSHIFT_DEPLOYMENTCONFIG
OPENSHIFT_IMAGESTREAM
OPENSHIFT_TEMPLATE
config.openshift.io
instead ofapps.openshift.io
.Screen shots / Gifs for design review:
Before:
With this PR:
Unit test coverage report:
Test setup:
Browser conformance: