Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kubevirt: RDP integration test #3681

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 11, 2019
Merged

kubevirt: RDP integration test #3681

merged 1 commit into from Dec 11, 2019

Conversation

mareklibra
Copy link
Contributor

First RDP-related integration test pushed to discuss scope and approach.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Dec 5, 2019
@mareklibra
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cc @rhrazdil

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the component/kubevirt Related to kubevirt-plugin label Dec 5, 2019
Copy link

@rhrazdil rhrazdil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only minor comments. IMO this is good and there's not more we can do in upstream.

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
import { $, $$ } from 'protractor';

export const consoleTypeSelectorId = '#console-type-selector';
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These don't need to be called as methods, it's okay to have for example:

launchRemoteViewerButton = $('.remote-viewer-pf-launch-vv');

etc.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done. But keeping function call for the ElementArrayFinder as I got stale reference error otherwise.

expect(launchRemoteDesktopButton().isEnabled()).toBe(true);

// there should be just the single laucher-pod
const hostIP = execSync("oc get pod -o yaml|grep hostIP| cut -d ':' -f 2")
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

use kubectl instead of oc please

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

.toString()
.trim();
const port = execSync(
`oc get service ${vm.name}-rdp -o yaml|grep nodePort| cut -d ':' -f 2`,
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

here as well

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@mareklibra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@rhrazdil
Copy link

rhrazdil commented Dec 9, 2019

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 9, 2019
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.4 milestone Dec 9, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 9, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 10, 2019
@mareklibra
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 10, 2019
@rhrazdil
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 10, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mareklibra, rhrazdil

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@mareklibra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

2 similar comments
@mareklibra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@mareklibra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jelkosz
Copy link

jelkosz commented Dec 11, 2019

/test e2e-gcp-console

1 similar comment
@jelkosz
Copy link

jelkosz commented Dec 11, 2019

/test e2e-gcp-console

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

12 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 11d0192 into openshift:master Dec 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. component/kubevirt Related to kubevirt-plugin lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants