Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1797027: Monitoring Dashboards: Fix variables handling #4184

Conversation

kyoto
Copy link
Member

@kyoto kyoto commented Feb 4, 2020

Fixes a bug where some variable dropdowns were not rendered, which in
turn caused cards that used the variable to not be rendered.

Also fixes a bug where the variable values were getting reset when the
Time Range option was changed.

Move the logic for loading variable options into the SingleVariableDropdown component.

Add error message when the variable options fail to load.

Fixes a bug where some variable dropdowns were not rendered, which in
turn caused cards that used the variable to not be rendered.

Also fixes a bug where the variable values were getting reset when the
Time Range option was changed.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@kyoto: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1797027, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Bug 1797027: Monitoring Dashboards: Fix variables handling

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. component/core Related to console core functionality component/monitoring Related to monitoring labels Feb 4, 2020
Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/lgtm

thanks @kyoto 👍

@@ -30,53 +31,128 @@ const evaluateTemplate = (s: string, variables: VariablesMap) =>
_.reduce(
variables,
(result: string, v: Variable, k: string): string => {
return result.replace(new RegExp(`\\$${k}`, 'g'), v.value);
return result.replace(new RegExp(`\\$${k}`, 'g'), v.value === undefined ? '' : v.value);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming null should also be '', we could use

Suggested change
return result.replace(new RegExp(`\\$${k}`, 'g'), v.value === undefined ? '' : v.value);
return result.replace(new RegExp(`\\$${k}`, 'g'), v.value || '');

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Thanks. v.value is a string so we don't need to worry about 0 values, etc.

Changed by #4221

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 4, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kyoto, spadgett

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

13 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 6a40459 into openshift:master Feb 5, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@kyoto: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1797027 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1797027: Monitoring Dashboards: Fix variables handling

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kyoto kyoto deleted the monitoring-dashboards-fix-variable-reset branch February 5, 2020 12:24
@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.4 milestone Feb 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/core Related to console core functionality component/monitoring Related to monitoring lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants