Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[release-4.4] Bug 1807061: Honor install mode when creating OperatorGroup in suggested namespace #4554

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 1, 2020
Merged

[release-4.4] Bug 1807061: Honor install mode when creating OperatorGroup in suggested namespace #4554

merged 1 commit into from Mar 1, 2020

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

This is an automated cherry-pick of #4480

/assign spadgett

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Feb 28, 2020
Merged
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1806831, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.4.0" release, but it targets "4.5.0" instead
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is ON_QA instead
  • expected Bugzilla bug 1806831 to depend on a bug targeting the "4.5.0" release and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-4.4] Bug 1806831: Honor install mode when creating OperatorGroup in suggested namespace

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 28, 2020
@spadgett spadgett changed the title [release-4.4] Bug 1806831: Honor install mode when creating OperatorGroup in suggested namespace [release-4.4] Bug 1807061: Honor install mode when creating OperatorGroup in suggested namespace Feb 28, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Feb 28, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1807061, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.4.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.4.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1806831 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1806831 targets the "4.5.0" release, matching the expected (4.5.0) release
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

[release-4.4] Bug 1807061: Honor install mode when creating OperatorGroup in suggested namespace

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added component/olm Related to OLM and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 28, 2020
@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/retest

spadgett
spadgett approved these changes Feb 28, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 28, 2020
@spadgett spadgett added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Feb 28, 2020
@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.4 milestone Feb 28, 2020
@spadgett spadgett added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 28, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, spadgett

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/test analyze

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

8 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

8 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 3ae00e8 into openshift:release-4.4 Mar 1, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1807061 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

[release-4.4] Bug 1807061: Honor install mode when creating OperatorGroup in suggested namespace

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@spadgett spadgett spadgett approved these changes

@jeff-phillips-18 jeff-phillips-18 Awaiting requested review from jeff-phillips-18

Assignees

@spadgett spadgett

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. component/olm Related to OLM lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v4.4
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
5 participants
@openshift-cherrypick-robot @openshift-ci-robot @spadgett @openshift-bot @openshift-merge-robot