Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1803780: Validate disk buses on created VMs #4600

Conversation

irosenzw
Copy link
Contributor

@irosenzw irosenzw commented Mar 3, 2020

Validate disk bus type for created VMs storage disks
using validations written in the template
the VMs were created from.

Signed-off-by: Ido Rosenzwig irosenzw@redhat.com

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Mar 3, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@irosenzw: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1803780, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1803780: Validate disk buses on created VMs

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 3, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the component/kubevirt Related to kubevirt-plugin label Mar 3, 2020
@irosenzw irosenzw force-pushed the validate-disk-bus-for-created-VMs branch 2 times, most recently from a9a9d57 to ef01219 Compare March 3, 2020 13:22
Validate disk bus type for created VMs storage disks
using validations written in the template
the VMs were created from.

Signed-off-by: Ido Rosenzwig <irosenzw@redhat.com>
@irosenzw irosenzw force-pushed the validate-disk-bus-for-created-VMs branch from ef01219 to 0dfd432 Compare March 3, 2020 13:54
@atiratree
Copy link
Member

this PR replaces #4335

/lgtm

@atiratree
Copy link
Member

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 3, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: irosenzw, suomiy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 3, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@irosenzw
Copy link
Contributor Author

irosenzw commented Mar 3, 2020

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0e18da4 into openshift:master Mar 3, 2020
@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.5 milestone Mar 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/kubevirt Related to kubevirt-plugin lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants