Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1811840: Fix name conflicts during testing #4732

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 18, 2020

Conversation

zherman0
Copy link
Member

When running all e2e test, the pod name used might still exist due to timing of delete, so I have simply created a unique name for the event testcase.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@zherman0: An error was encountered adding this pull request to the external tracker bugs for bug 1811840 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

JSONRPC error 68000: Bad argument param sent to Bugzilla::FlagType::new function.
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Bug 1811840: Fix name conflicts during testing

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 13, 2020
@zherman0
Copy link
Member Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@zherman0: An error was encountered adding this pull request to the external tracker bugs for bug 1811840 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

JSONRPC error 68000: Bad argument param sent to Bugzilla::FlagType::new function.
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@zherman0
Copy link
Member Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@zherman0: An error was encountered adding this pull request to the external tracker bugs for bug 1811840 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

JSONRPC error 68000: Bad argument param sent to Bugzilla::FlagType::new function.
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@zherman0
Copy link
Member Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@zherman0: An error was encountered adding this pull request to the external tracker bugs for bug 1811840 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

JSONRPC error 68000: Bad argument param sent to Bugzilla::FlagType::new function.
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@hongkailiu
Copy link
Member

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@hongkailiu: An error was encountered adding this pull request to the external tracker bugs for bug 1811840 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

JSONRPC error 68000: Bad argument param sent to Bugzilla::FlagType::new function.
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@zherman0
Copy link
Member Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@zherman0: An error was encountered adding this pull request to the external tracker bugs for bug 1811840 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

JSONRPC error 68000: Bad argument param sent to Bugzilla::FlagType::new function.
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@zherman0
Copy link
Member Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@zherman0: An error was encountered adding this pull request to the external tracker bugs for bug 1811840 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

JSONRPC error 68000: Bad argument param sent to Bugzilla::FlagType::new function.
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@benjaminapetersen benjaminapetersen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 17, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: benjaminapetersen, zherman0

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 17, 2020
@benjaminapetersen
Copy link
Contributor

/cherry-pick release-4.4

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@benjaminapetersen: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.4 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@zherman0
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/cherry-pick release-4.4

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@spadgett: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.4 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.5 milestone Mar 17, 2020
@spadgett spadgett added the kind/test-flake Categorizes issue or PR as related to test flakes. label Mar 17, 2020
@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit ca88935 into openshift:master Mar 18, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@zherman0: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1811840 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1811840: Fix name conflicts during testing

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@benjaminapetersen: new pull request created: #4757

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/test-flake Categorizes issue or PR as related to test flakes. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants