New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1824029: Handle undefined MachineConfigPools status #5068
Conversation
@jhadvig: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1824029, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.4 |
@jhadvig: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.4 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
if (_.isUndefined(mcp.status)) { | ||
return K8sResourceConditionStatus.Unknown; | ||
} | ||
const { conditions } = mcp.status; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if (_.isUndefined(mcp.status)) { | |
return K8sResourceConditionStatus.Unknown; | |
} | |
const { conditions } = mcp.status; | |
const { conditions } = mcp.status || {}; |
@spadgett comment addressed. PTAL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jhadvig, spadgett The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@jhadvig: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/console#5068. Bugzilla bug 1824029 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@jhadvig: new pull request created: #5102 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.3 |
@jhadvig: #5068 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.3":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
When creating a fresh MCP and immediately redirecting to the MCP list page, the created MCP is missing the
status
field. Defaulting toUnknown
for the condition columns when the status is missing.Screen:
Wasnt really sure here if
Unknown
is better then-
/assign @spadgett