Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove method searchYAML from console-shared #5074

Merged

Conversation

rhrazdil
Copy link

As pointed out by @spadgett in #2125,
searchYAML has several pitfalls and should not be used.

Removed this method from console-shared and updated test cases that used this method.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added component/kubevirt Related to kubevirt-plugin component/shared Related to console-shared labels Apr 16, 2020
Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 thank you

@@ -225,8 +225,12 @@ describe('Test clone VM.', () => {

it('Cloned VM has vm.kubevirt.io/name label.', () => {
expect(
searchYAML(`vm.kubevirt.io/name: ${vm.name}`, clonedVM.name, clonedVM.namespace, 'vm'),
).toBeTruthy();
_.get(
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, updated

_.get(
getLabels(getResourceObject(vm.name, vm.namespace, 'vmi')),
'vm.kubevirt.io/name',
undefined,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No need to pass the third arg here. If no default is passed, undefined would be returned anyway.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wanted to be explicit, but yeah, it's unnecessary. Removed it.

@rhrazdil
Copy link
Author

CI keeps failing
/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 16, 2020
@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/retest

Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/lgtm

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 16, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 16, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhrazdil, spadgett

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 16, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 293e553 into openshift:master Apr 16, 2020
@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.5 milestone Apr 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. component/kubevirt Related to kubevirt-plugin component/shared Related to console-shared lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants