Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1827297: Fix resource limits validation error #5172

Merged

Conversation

debsmita1
Copy link
Contributor

@debsmita1 debsmita1 commented Apr 23, 2020

Fixes
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-3111

Analysis / Root cause
when unit cores is selected the value of the unit is read as undefined, which when concatenated with the numeric value and passed to convertToBaseValue, null is returned.

Solution Description
added ensure() in the yup validation of requestUnit and limitUnit so that it accepts <empty-string> and don't consider them as undefined.

GIF
RL

/kind bug

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. component/dev-console Related to dev-console labels Apr 23, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the component/shared Related to console-shared label Apr 23, 2020
@debsmita1 debsmita1 changed the title Fix resource limits validation error Bug 1827297: Fix resource limits validation error Apr 23, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/unspecified bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 23, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@debsmita1: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1827297, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1827297: Fix resource limits validation error

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

convertToBaseValue(`${request}${requestUnit}`) <=
convertToBaseValue(`${limit}${limitUnit}`)
(requestUnit ? convertToBaseValue(`${request}${requestUnit}`) : request) <=
(limitUnit ? convertToBaseValue(`${limit}${limitUnit}`) : limit)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So convertToBaseValue returns the number only, if unit is not present. That means it should work here as when cores is selected the selectedKey is an empty string and hence the respective unit value should be an '' ". Instead of adding an extra check here which is already present in convertToBaseValue you should try to figure out why we are getting undefined instead of " " here. Units should never be undefined because we are setting a default unit and in case it changes we should have that unit value or " " in case of cores.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@debsmita1 debsmita1 Apr 23, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have removed these changes and added ensure() in the yup validation of requestUnit and limitUnit so that <empty-string> is not considered as undefined

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@debsmita1: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1827297, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1827297: Fix resource limits validation error

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@divyanshiGupta
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 23, 2020
@andrewballantyne
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @christianvogt

@nemesis09
Copy link
Contributor

verified locally, works as expected
/lgtm

@christianvogt
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: christianvogt, debsmita1, divyanshiGupta, nemesis09

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 24, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c0668c4 into openshift:master Apr 25, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@debsmita1: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/console#5172. Bugzilla bug 1827297 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1827297: Fix resource limits validation error

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.5 milestone Apr 28, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/dev-console Related to dev-console component/shared Related to console-shared kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants