Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1829928: Fixes: missing pod donut for DS in sidebar overview tab #5247

Merged
merged 3 commits into from May 5, 2020

Conversation

sahil143
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-3114

Analysis / Root cause:

Missing PodRing for Daemon set overview page and sidebar
Missing EditPodCount action for StatefulSets menu action on sidebar

Solution Description:

Added PodRing for Daemon and EditPodCount action for StatefulSets menu action

Screen shots / Gifs for design review:

Screenshot from 2020-04-30 20-42-09
Screenshot from 2020-04-30 20-42-23
Screenshot from 2020-04-30 20-42-33

Unit test coverage report:

Test setup:

Browser conformance:

  • Chrome
  • Firefox
  • Safari
  • Edge

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. label Apr 30, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sahil143: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1829928, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1829928: Fixes: missing pod donut for DS in sidebar overview tab

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 30, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added component/shared Related to console-shared needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Apr 30, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 4, 2020
namespace,
prop: 'pods',
prop: podRingFirehoseProps[PodModel.kind],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need podRingFirehoseProps can we use PodModel.plural directly

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have been using camelCase fro props name and these are being used in other places as well changing here will have to change in other places as well

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

makes sense

@@ -992,3 +992,20 @@ export const getPodsForStatefulSets = (ss: K8sResourceKind[], resources: any): P
};
});
};

export const getPodsForDaemonSets = (ds: K8sResourceKind[], resources: any): PodRCData[] => {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we know type for resources

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For resources, we have been using any everywhere

@invincibleJai
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

Verified locally seems both scenario for SS/DS works as expected

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 5, 2020
@christianvogt
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: christianvogt, invincibleJai, sahil143

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 5, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit bcd3593 into openshift:master May 5, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sahil143: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/console#5247. Bugzilla bug 1829928 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1829928: Fixes: missing pod donut for DS in sidebar overview tab

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.5 milestone May 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/core Related to console core functionality component/shared Related to console-shared lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants