New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1829928: Fixes: missing pod donut for DS in sidebar overview tab #5247
Conversation
@sahil143: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1829928, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
add PodRing to daemon set overview page refactor PodRingController utilities
namespace, | ||
prop: 'pods', | ||
prop: podRingFirehoseProps[PodModel.kind], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we need podRingFirehoseProps
can we use PodModel.plural
directly
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have been using camelCase fro props name and these are being used in other places as well changing here will have to change in other places as well
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
makes sense
@@ -992,3 +992,20 @@ export const getPodsForStatefulSets = (ss: K8sResourceKind[], resources: any): P | |||
}; | |||
}); | |||
}; | |||
|
|||
export const getPodsForDaemonSets = (ds: K8sResourceKind[], resources: any): PodRCData[] => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we know type for resources
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For resources, we have been using any
everywhere
/lgtm Verified locally seems both scenario for SS/DS works as expected |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: christianvogt, invincibleJai, sahil143 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@sahil143: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/console#5247. Bugzilla bug 1829928 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Fixes: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-3114
Analysis / Root cause:
Missing PodRing for Daemon set overview page and sidebar
Missing EditPodCount action for StatefulSets menu action on sidebar
Solution Description:
Added PodRing for Daemon and EditPodCount action for StatefulSets menu action
Screen shots / Gifs for design review:
Unit test coverage report:
Test setup:
Browser conformance: