New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1834945: Add sticky footer to PipelineBuilderForm #5415
Bug 1834945: Add sticky footer to PipelineBuilderForm #5415
Conversation
@divyanshiGupta: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1834945, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
364e519
to
44c1413
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@divyanshiGupta: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1834945, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
44c1413
to
6b1b9a8
Compare
6b1b9a8
to
64de5a6
Compare
64de5a6
to
85ff5b2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit and an unexpected style. But otherwise looking good.
...tend/packages/dev-console/src/components/pipelines/pipeline-builder/PipelineBuilderForm.scss
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ | |||
.odc-pipeline-builder-page { | |||
height: 100%; | |||
position: relative; | |||
overflow-x: hidden; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is this getting around? Horizontal overflow shouldn't really ever need to be explicitly mentioned if I did my job with the layout 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@andrewballantyne I added this to avoid
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting. I'll have to look to reproduce that. Did you zoom in? The bubble looks cut off.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, see if you can reproduce it. No I didn't zoom in.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I cannot reproduce this. 🤔 You look to be using Chrome... is this on Linux? What version of Chrome?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes I am using Chrome. Yup on linux.
@andrewballantyne just to be sure you tried to reproduce this after removing the overflow property, right? 😅 . If yes then it might be because of my display settings probably.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Haha yes I did. I also tried several zoom features to try and reproduce the unbalance of the node. I think there is definitely something happening here with an upscale to your UI. I think it would be useful for us to determine what that is... even the icons for the "+" buttons look off.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah then its because of my display settings, I keep my scaling factor to 1.25 :P.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting. Maybe this is just another reason for us to convert the node to SVG (from a foreignObject div usage)
85ff5b2
to
7d40380
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see anything inherently wrong with the overflow styles. But I do want to investigate the origins of needing it @divyanshiGupta
I'm going to get this merged asap but we should definitely circle back to how you're having these issues. It looks subpar on styling and mechanics from your gif.
/lgtm
/retest
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: andrewballantyne, divyanshiGupta The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
3 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@divyanshiGupta: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/console#5415. Bugzilla bug 1834945 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Fixes: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-3742
Screenshot:
/kind bug