Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1834945: Add sticky footer to PipelineBuilderForm #5415

Merged

Conversation

divyanshiGupta
Copy link
Contributor

@divyanshiGupta divyanshiGupta commented May 12, 2020

Fixes: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-3742

Screenshot:
image

/kind bug

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. labels May 12, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@divyanshiGupta: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1834945, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1834945: Add sticky footer to PipelineBuilderForm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/dev-console Related to dev-console labels May 12, 2020
@divyanshiGupta divyanshiGupta force-pushed the jira-issue#3742 branch 2 times, most recently from 364e519 to 44c1413 Compare May 12, 2020 18:11
Copy link
Contributor

@andrewballantyne andrewballantyne left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We lost the static sidebar. You can now scroll away from the full-sidebar.

image

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@divyanshiGupta: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1834945, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1834945: Add sticky footer to PipelineBuilderForm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 15, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 15, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@andrewballantyne andrewballantyne left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit and an unexpected style. But otherwise looking good.

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
.odc-pipeline-builder-page {
height: 100%;
position: relative;
overflow-x: hidden;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is this getting around? Horizontal overflow shouldn't really ever need to be explicitly mentioned if I did my job with the layout 😄

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@andrewballantyne I added this to avoid
Peek 2020-05-19 18-48

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting. I'll have to look to reproduce that. Did you zoom in? The bubble looks cut off.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, see if you can reproduce it. No I didn't zoom in.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I cannot reproduce this. 🤔 You look to be using Chrome... is this on Linux? What version of Chrome?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes I am using Chrome. Yup on linux.
@andrewballantyne just to be sure you tried to reproduce this after removing the overflow property, right? 😅 . If yes then it might be because of my display settings probably.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Haha yes I did. I also tried several zoom features to try and reproduce the unbalance of the node. I think there is definitely something happening here with an upscale to your UI. I think it would be useful for us to determine what that is... even the icons for the "+" buttons look off.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah then its because of my display settings, I keep my scaling factor to 1.25 :P.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So even with scaling factor set to 1 I still see this 🤔
Peek 2020-05-20 01-39

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting. Maybe this is just another reason for us to convert the node to SVG (from a foreignObject div usage)

Copy link
Contributor

@andrewballantyne andrewballantyne left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see anything inherently wrong with the overflow styles. But I do want to investigate the origins of needing it @divyanshiGupta

I'm going to get this merged asap but we should definitely circle back to how you're having these issues. It looks subpar on styling and mechanics from your gif.

/lgtm
/retest

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andrewballantyne, divyanshiGupta

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 19, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 5a09960 into openshift:master May 20, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@divyanshiGupta: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/console#5415. Bugzilla bug 1834945 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1834945: Add sticky footer to PipelineBuilderForm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/dev-console Related to dev-console kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants