Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1829542: Add mount guest agent tools to vm wizard #5490

Conversation

yaacov
Copy link
Member

@yaacov yaacov commented May 19, 2020

When Selecting a Windows Operating System in the VM creation wizard there is no indication that Guess Tools have been added to the virtual hardware section.

Ref:
http://openshift.github.io/openshift-origin-design/designs/virtualization/4.3/create-vm/step-1-genaral/#operating-system-field

Screenshot:
screenshot-localhost_9000-2020 05 27-17_31_56

Peek 2020-05-27 17-31

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@yaacov: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1829542, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1829542: Add mount guest agent tools to vm wizard

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 19, 2020
@yaacov
Copy link
Member Author

yaacov commented May 19, 2020

@suomiy @glekner @irosenzw @pcbailey please review

@yaacov
Copy link
Member Author

yaacov commented May 19, 2020

/test images

@atiratree
Copy link
Member

/assign

@@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ export const getInitialVmSettings = (data: CommonData): VMSettings => {
[VMSettingsField.OPERATING_SYSTEM]: {
isRequired: asRequired(true),
},
[VMSettingsField.MOUNT_WINDOWS_GUEST_TOOLS]: {
value: true,
isRequired: asRequired(false),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no need, for isRequired false value,

also we should have this initially hidden

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done 👍

@@ -113,6 +122,22 @@ export const OSFlavor: React.FC<OSFlavorProps> = React.memo(
</FormSelect>
</FormField>
</FormFieldRow>
{isWindows && (
<FormFieldRow
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this clashes with isHidden wizard logic. We should always render FormFieldRow and set isHidden flag when required

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The main advantage of keeping all these variables (hidden, disabled, required) in redux is that we can easily monitor the wizard (through ReduxDevTools) and see all the changes it makes with each change

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done 👍

@@ -91,6 +93,13 @@ export const OSFlavor: React.FC<OSFlavorProps> = React.memo(
}
}

const isWindows = os && os.startsWith('win');
const mountWindowsGuestToolsMessage = (
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we inline it? We would have 3 lines less of code

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done 🍰

onChange={(v) => onChange(VMSettingsField.MOUNT_WINDOWS_GUEST_TOOLS, v)}
label="Mount Windows guest tools"
/>
{mountWindowsGuestToolsMessage}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this shouldn't be inside the <FormField/>

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's inside the form because it's a hint message for this form field, it is part of this form field

>
<FormField>
<Checkbox
id={getFieldId(VMSettingsField.MOUNT_WINDOWS_GUEST_TOOLS, 'checkbox')}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the id should be defined in idResolver - you can add append checkbox there

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@@ -141,8 +166,9 @@ type OSFlavorProps = {
commonTemplates: any;
flavorField: any;
operatinSystemField: any;
mountWindoesGuestTools: any;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Windoes ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:-) +1

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed 🤦

userTemplate: string;
workloadProfile: string;
openshiftFlag: boolean;
onChange: (key: string, value: string) => void;
onChange: (key: string, value: any) => void;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we do string | boolean instead?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
import * as _ from 'lodash';
import * as React from 'react';
import { FormSelect, FormSelectOption } from '@patternfly/react-core';
import { FormSelect, FormSelectOption, Checkbox } from '@patternfly/react-core';
import { getFieldId } from '@console/shared';
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please try to import the whole path when you do import from shared - it is very easy to get into trouble doing this

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

@@ -6,3 +6,7 @@
.kubevirt-create-vm-modal__memory-row {
margin-right: 0.5em;
}

.kubevirt-create-vm-modal__sub-field-row {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

where is this class used?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it is adding a little space between the help comment and the checkbox

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you using the patternfly checkbox component? It shouldn't require any special styles

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@matthewcarleton

Are you using the patternfly checkbox component?

yes

It shouldn't require any special styles

The wizard and wizard components add styling and layout.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is not the wizard.

This is due to the bootstrap _forms.scss styling

wchich adds this

 // Position radios and checkboxes better
input[type="radio"],
input[type="checkbox"] {
margin: 4px 0 0;
margin-top: 1px \9; // IE8-9
line-height: normal;
}

so we either need to add css to counter that or disable global bootstrap

@@ -147,19 +147,27 @@ const flavorUpdater = ({ id, prevState, dispatch, getState }: UpdateOptions) =>

const osUpdater = ({ id, prevState, dispatch, getState }: UpdateOptions) => {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we could make the logic a bit more reconcilable here.

Let's do two updaters

osUpdater

  • called first
  • resolves the MOUNT_WINDOWS_GUEST_TOOLS field according to the os (win, etc)
    • should set value (false if linux for example) and isHidden

winToolsUpdater

  • called after osUpdater
  • should create storage if MOUNT_WINDOWS_GUEST_TOOLS value is true but storage does not exist
  • should remove storage if MOUNT_WINDOWS_GUEST_TOOLS is false and storage exists

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done 👍

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added component/core Related to console core functionality component/olm Related to OLM and removed approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels May 20, 2020
@yaacov yaacov force-pushed the add-mount-guest-agent-tools-to-vm-wizard branch from 36265a9 to 4eda5b6 Compare May 20, 2020 16:45
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 20, 2020
@yaacov yaacov force-pushed the add-mount-guest-agent-tools-to-vm-wizard branch 2 times, most recently from 24de709 to fff5e8e Compare May 20, 2020 17:43
@@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ export const getInitialVmSettings = (data: CommonData): VMSettings => {
[VMSettingsField.OPERATING_SYSTEM]: {
isRequired: asRequired(true),
},
[VMSettingsField.MOUNT_WINDOWS_GUEST_TOOLS]: {
value: false,
isHidden: asHidden(true),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
isHidden: asHidden(true),
isHidden: asHidden(true, VMSettingsField.OPERATING_SYSTEM),

It is also good to specify a reason why this is hidden (if we know it). So it is easier for multiple updaters to change the isHidden property (and give their reasons)

It is also then easier to debug this and see who has hidden this field

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@@ -152,14 +152,34 @@ const osUpdater = ({ id, prevState, dispatch, getState }: UpdateOptions) => {
}
const os = iGetVmSettingValue(state, id, VMSettingsField.OPERATING_SYSTEM);
const isWindows = os && os.startsWith('win');
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we convert this to boolean?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure 👍

vmWizardInternalActions[InternalActionType.UpdateVmSettingsField](
id,
VMSettingsField.MOUNT_WINDOWS_GUEST_TOOLS,
{ isHidden: asHidden(!isWindows), value: isWindows },
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let's use the os reason here as mentioned

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@@ -152,14 +152,34 @@ const osUpdater = ({ id, prevState, dispatch, getState }: UpdateOptions) => {
}
const os = iGetVmSettingValue(state, id, VMSettingsField.OPERATING_SYSTEM);
const isWindows = os && os.startsWith('win');

dispatch(
Copy link
Member

@atiratree atiratree May 21, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO, we should also consider the vm import part here.

can we change the value to false when isProviderImport? But keep it visible in case some import providers (possibly vmWare) wish to use it.

In case of ovirt provider it is actually impossible to use this field so can we hide it in ovirt-state-update.ts?

We should also register field reset for MOUNT_WINDOWS_GUEST_TOOLS in each provider - look for vmFieldUpdate

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't have an env to test and check this scenarios ...

@suomiy can you take it as a follow up PR ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be few lines, just use vmFieldUpdate in the same way like for other VM fields and also register isHidden in ovirt provider in the same spot/update.

I can test your PR, once you have it.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added a gate to not mount when in import view

@pcbailey
Copy link
Contributor

Would it be possible to make the Virtual Hardware in the message a link to the Virtual Hardware tab? Or is that something we don't want to do for some reason? Thoughts?

@matthewcarleton What do you think?

const os = iGetVmSettingValue(state, id, VMSettingsField.OPERATING_SYSTEM);
const isWindows = os && os.startsWith('win');
const os: string = iGetVmSettingValue(state, id, VMSettingsField.OPERATING_SYSTEM);
const isWindows: boolean = os && os.startsWith('win');

This comment was marked as outdated.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@matthewcarleton
Copy link
Contributor

Would it be possible to make the Virtual Hardware in the message a link to the Virtual Hardware tab? Or is that something we don't want to do for some reason? Thoughts?

@matthewcarleton What do you think?

I think that would be a nice addition!

@matthewcarleton
Copy link
Contributor

When Selecting a Windows Operating System in the VM creation wizard there is no indication that Guess Tools have been added to the virtual hardware section.

Ref:
http://openshift.github.io/openshift-origin-design/designs/virtualization/4.3/create-vm/step-1-genaral/#operating-system-field

Screenshot:

screenshot-localhost_9000-2020 05 19-17_11_32

the spacing feels a bit off from the design. Can we get it closer?
Screen Shot 2020-05-21 at 4 53 49 PM

Peek 2020-05-19 17-11

@atiratree
Copy link
Member

atiratree commented May 22, 2020

Can we have a link to that tab as well?
Something similar to what we do in import providers?

aaa

@matthewcarleton
Copy link
Contributor

Can we have a link to that tab as well?
Something similar to what we do in import providers?

aaa

I think this is what @pcbailey is asking for to right?

@atiratree
Copy link
Member

I think this is what @pcbailey is asking for to right?

ok cool, I was just making sure after seeing the design

@yaacov
btw you can take a look on how this is implemented in wizard-errors.tsx

@pcbailey
Copy link
Contributor

@matthewcarleton @suomiy Yup! This is exactly what I was asking to have done. =)

@yaacov yaacov force-pushed the add-mount-guest-agent-tools-to-vm-wizard branch from 0dad952 to 44edcf9 Compare May 27, 2020 14:22
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 27, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@yaacov: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1829542, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.5.0" release, but it targets "4.6.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1829542: Add mount guest agent tools to vm wizard

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@yaacov: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1829542, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1829542: Add mount guest agent tools to vm wizard

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@yaacov
Copy link
Member Author

yaacov commented Aug 5, 2020

/retest

1 similar comment
@yaacov
Copy link
Member Author

yaacov commented Aug 6, 2020

/retest

@yaacov
Copy link
Member Author

yaacov commented Aug 6, 2020

@suomiy please re-review

@@ -153,22 +153,23 @@ const osUpdater = ({ id, prevState, dispatch, getState }: UpdateOptions) => {
if (iGetCommonData(state, id, VMWizardProps.isProviderImport)) {
return;
}
if (iGetCommonData(state, id, VMWizardProps.isProviderImport)) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

twice?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wanted to be extra sure :-) , removed 👍

@@ -211,6 +212,31 @@ const baseImageUpdater = ({ id, prevState, dispatch, getState }: UpdateOptions)
);
};

const windowsToolsUpdater = ({ id, prevState, dispatch, getState }: UpdateOptions) => {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good, but we should move this updater to storage-tab-state-update.ts so the relevant will be together

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

moved to storage 👍

</FormField>
</FormFieldRow>
{(cloneBaseDiskImage || mountWindowsGuestTools) && (
<Text className="kv-create-vm__input-checkbox">
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i know it works, but the name does not reflect the reality :)

either

  • make more generic name
  • make 2nd class

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:-) yea

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changed to kv-create-vm__input-text-help-msg 👍

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

any reason you can't use pf-c-form__helper-text here instead?

</FormFieldRow>
{(cloneBaseDiskImage || mountWindowsGuestTools) && (
<Text className="kv-create-vm__input-checkbox">
View the mounted disk in the{' '}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we probably should pluralize this depending on the number of checkboxes checked

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pluralized 🥞

/>
</FormField>
</FormFieldRow>
{(cloneBaseDiskImage || mountWindowsGuestTools) && (
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not having the Virtualized HW step simplifies things a bit :)

@@ -137,7 +145,34 @@ export const internalStorageDiskBusUpdater = ({
}
};

const windowsToolsUpdater = ({ id, prevState, dispatch, getState }: UpdateOptions) => {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it should be declared/called before the internalStorageDiskBusUpdater so the validation to it applies as well

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

moved to before internalStorageDiskBusUpdater

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please move the code block as well. We are striving for our updaters to be declared in the same order they are executed in. It is much easier to read the file from top to the bottom to asses what is happening in sequence, than jumping across different sections of the file.

There are few exceptions (eg prefillVmTemplateUpdater) where the updater would get too long and such updaters are moved to new files.

@@ -145,6 +148,22 @@ export const OSFlavor: React.FC<OSFlavorProps> = React.memo(
);
const baseImage = operatingSystemBaseImages.find((image) => image.id === os);

const numOfMountedDisks = cloneBaseDiskImage + mountWindowsGuestTools; // using boolean addition operator to count true
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wow, this seems so hacky :)

const numOfMountedDisks = cloneBaseDiskImage + mountWindowsGuestTools; // using boolean addition operator to count true
const mountedDisksHelpMsg = numOfMountedDisks > 0 && (
<Text className="kv-create-vm__input-text-help-msg">
View the mounted {pluralize(numOfMountedDisks, 'disk', 'disks', false)} in the{' '}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we also have pluralize function in our package which is easier to use and does not depend on details-page file

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

using our own pluralize :-)

@yaacov
Copy link
Member Author

yaacov commented Aug 7, 2020

/retest

1 similar comment
@yaacov
Copy link
Member Author

yaacov commented Aug 7, 2020

/retest

Copy link
Member

@atiratree atiratree left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

one last thing :)

@@ -137,7 +145,34 @@ export const internalStorageDiskBusUpdater = ({
}
};

const windowsToolsUpdater = ({ id, prevState, dispatch, getState }: UpdateOptions) => {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please move the code block as well. We are striving for our updaters to be declared in the same order they are executed in. It is much easier to read the file from top to the bottom to asses what is happening in sequence, than jumping across different sections of the file.

There are few exceptions (eg prefillVmTemplateUpdater) where the updater would get too long and such updaters are moved to new files.

@yaacov
Copy link
Member Author

yaacov commented Aug 7, 2020

/retest

@atiratree
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 7, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: suomiy, yaacov

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@yaacov
Copy link
Member Author

yaacov commented Aug 7, 2020

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 3069ceb into openshift:master Aug 8, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@yaacov: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/console#5490. Bugzilla bug 1829542 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1829542: Add mount guest agent tools to vm wizard

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.6 milestone Aug 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/core Related to console core functionality component/kubevirt Related to kubevirt-plugin component/olm Related to OLM lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants