Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1844347: Align kubevirt tests with ux changes, fix teardown in environment tests #5675

Merged

Conversation

rhrazdil
Copy link

@rhrazdil rhrazdil commented Jun 5, 2020

  • in disk modal, selection of SC that allows RWM automatically opens Advanced options, so we need to make sure we don't close it when selecting these
  • increasing timeouts for flaking vm environment expect script
  • simplified rdp console scenario, reduced the memory size to 1Gi so small clusters can run the test

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added component/kubevirt Related to kubevirt-plugin approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jun 5, 2020
@rhrazdil rhrazdil changed the title Align kubevirt tests with ux changes, fix teardown in environment tests Bug 1844347: Align kubevirt tests with ux changes, fix teardown in environment tests Jun 5, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. label Jun 5, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rhrazdil: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1844347, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1844347: Align kubevirt tests with ux changes, fix teardown in environment tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 5, 2020
@yaacov
Copy link
Member

yaacov commented Jun 7, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. label Jun 7, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@yaacov: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1844347, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 7, 2020
@@ -62,13 +63,6 @@ describe('Kubevirt non-admin Flow', () => {
it(
'ID(CNV-1718) non-admin create project and create/remove vm',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since create project is moved to beforeAll, the test name need to update accordingly.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated the name

@rhrazdil
Copy link
Author

rhrazdil commented Jun 9, 2020

@yaacov Could you review please?

@@ -60,15 +61,8 @@ describe('Kubevirt non-admin Flow', () => {
});

it(
'ID(CNV-1718) non-admin create project and create/remove vm',
'ID(CNV-1718) non-admin create create and remove a vm',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice :-)

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh create create 🤦 ....

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:-)

@yaacov
Copy link
Member

yaacov commented Jun 9, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 9, 2020
const vm = await wizard.createVirtualMachine(
vmConfig(configName.toLowerCase(), testName, provisionConfig),
);
const vm = await wizard.createVirtualMachine(vm1Config);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we use createResource(testVM) here? Other tests vm.detail.* are using it.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would keep the VM generated in the Wizard for the sake of being sure the VM labels have correct format.

@yaacov
Copy link
Member

yaacov commented Jun 9, 2020

/lgtm cancel

will re-lgmt when fixed :-)

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 9, 2020
@yaacov
Copy link
Member

yaacov commented Jun 9, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 9, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhrazdil, yaacov

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@yaacov
Copy link
Member

yaacov commented Jun 9, 2020

/test e2e-gcp-console

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit ef8f3ae into openshift:master Jun 9, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rhrazdil: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/console#5675. Bugzilla bug 1844347 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1844347: Align kubevirt tests with ux changes, fix teardown in environment tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rhrazdil
Copy link
Author

/cherry-pick release-4.5

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@rhrazdil: new pull request created: #5708

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.6 milestone Jun 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/kubevirt Related to kubevirt-plugin lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants