Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Custom support statement for templates #7311

Merged

Conversation

rawagner
Copy link
Contributor

@rawagner rawagner commented Nov 24, 2020

Screenshot from 2020-11-24 13-14-14

Screenshot from 2020-11-24 13-14-03

Screenshot from 2020-11-24 13-14-46
Screenshot from 2020-11-24 13-15-23

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the component/kubevirt Related to kubevirt-plugin label Nov 24, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 24, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the component/core Related to console core functionality label Nov 24, 2020
@rawagner rawagner force-pushed the vmt_support_custom branch 2 times, most recently from 89f6ab7 to 30c4788 Compare November 26, 2020 07:50
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 26, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 26, 2020
@rawagner
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@rawagner rawagner force-pushed the vmt_support_custom branch 2 times, most recently from 774ab49 to 1fc69ef Compare November 26, 2020 11:00
@glekner
Copy link
Contributor

glekner commented Nov 26, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 26, 2020
@glekner
Copy link
Contributor

glekner commented Nov 26, 2020

/retest

1 similar comment
@rawagner
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 30, 2020
@glekner
Copy link
Contributor

glekner commented Nov 30, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 30, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@rawagner
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 1, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Dec 1, 2020
@rawagner rawagner force-pushed the vmt_support_custom branch 2 times, most recently from ef39ee3 to 549c7fe Compare December 1, 2020 08:47
@rawagner
Copy link
Contributor Author

rawagner commented Dec 1, 2020

/retest

@glekner
Copy link
Contributor

glekner commented Dec 1, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 1, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 1, 2020
@glekner
Copy link
Contributor

glekner commented Dec 1, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 1, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: glekner, rawagner

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit dbeb3f6 into openshift:master Dec 2, 2020
@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.7 milestone Dec 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. component/core Related to console core functionality component/kubevirt Related to kubevirt-plugin lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants