Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1897008: Cypress: reenable check for 'aria-hidden-focus' rule & checkA11y test for modals #7382

Conversation

dtaylor113
Copy link
Contributor

@dtaylor113 dtaylor113 commented Dec 1, 2020

This PR re-enables the a11y check for 'aria-hidden-focus' rule and allows A11y testing of Modals in isolation. Updated modal div to <div id="modal-container" role="dialog" aria-modal="true" />.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@dtaylor113: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1897008, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1897008: Cypress: reenable check for 'aria-hidden-focus' rule & checkA11y test for modals

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 1, 2020
@openshift openshift deleted a comment from openshift-ci-robot Dec 1, 2020
@openshift openshift deleted a comment from openshift-ci-robot Dec 1, 2020
@openshift openshift deleted a comment from openshift-ci-robot Dec 1, 2020
@openshift openshift deleted a comment from openshift-ci-robot Dec 1, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@dtaylor113: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1897008, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1897008: Cypress: reenable check for 'aria-hidden-focus' rule & checkA11y test for modals

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

spadgett commented Dec 1, 2020

@dtaylor113 Can we simply add aria-disabled to the app element when the modal is open instead of adding it to every input? I don't it's scalable to have the individual components need to check if there is a modal open.

@dtaylor113
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dtaylor113 Can we simply add aria-disabled to the app element when the modal is open instead of adding it to every input? I don't it's scalable to have the individual components need to check if there is a modal open.

Tried this and it didn't work :-( Neither did any of the suggestions here

@openshift openshift deleted a comment from openshift-ci-robot Dec 2, 2020
@dtaylor113 dtaylor113 force-pushed the cypress-a11y-aria-hidden-focus branch from 6163bec to 3a5b471 Compare December 2, 2020 19:51
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the component/core Related to console core functionality label Dec 2, 2020
@openshift openshift deleted a comment from openshift-ci-robot Dec 2, 2020
@openshift openshift deleted a comment from openshift-ci-robot Dec 2, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@dtaylor113: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1897008, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1897008: Cypress: reenable check for 'aria-hidden-focus' rule & checkA11y test for modals

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@dtaylor113: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1897008, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1897008: Cypress: reenable check for 'aria-hidden-focus' rule & checkA11y test for modals

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dtaylor113
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated PR to re-enables the a11y check for 'aria-hidden-focus' rule and allows A11y testing of Modals in isolation. Updated modal div to <div id="modal-container" role="dialog" aria-modal="true" />.

@dtaylor113
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

],
});
a11yTestResults.numberChecks += 1;
cy.checkA11y(
null,
selector || null,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think you need || null here? Does it cause a problem leaving that off?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed, removed || null

@dtaylor113 dtaylor113 force-pushed the cypress-a11y-aria-hidden-focus branch from dc4f163 to 40034f8 Compare December 3, 2020 21:14
Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 4, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dtaylor113, spadgett

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 4, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 1696178 into openshift:master Dec 4, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@dtaylor113: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1897008 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1897008: Cypress: reenable check for 'aria-hidden-focus' rule & checkA11y test for modals

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.7 milestone Dec 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/core Related to console core functionality lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants