Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CONSOLE-2371: [i18n] Externalize olm operand related strings #7500

Merged

Conversation

TheRealJon
Copy link
Member

Externalize strings in frontend/packages/operator-lifecycle-manager/src/components/operand

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the component/olm Related to OLM label Dec 9, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 9, 2020
@spadgett spadgett changed the title [i18n] Externalize olm operand related strings CONSOLE-2371: [i18n] Externalize olm operand related strings Dec 10, 2020
@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.7 milestone Dec 10, 2020
@TheRealJon
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@TheRealJon: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-console c0b893f link /test e2e-gcp-console

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Member

@rhamilto rhamilto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Create and Cancel are already in public namespace, so no reason to add them to olm, too.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added component/core Related to console core functionality and removed approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Dec 18, 2020
@TheRealJon
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @ahardin-rh @yapei

@TheRealJon
Copy link
Member Author

/hold

For qe and docs approval

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 4, 2021
@rhamilto
Copy link
Member

rhamilto commented Jan 5, 2021

@TheRealJon rebase required.

@TheRealJon
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @sferich888

@ahardin-rh
Copy link

/label docs-approved

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the docs-approved Signifies that Docs has signed off on this PR label Jan 5, 2021
Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jan 5, 2021
@TheRealJon
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

16 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@spadgett spadgett added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. kind/i18n Indicates issue or PR relates to internationalization or has content that needs to be translated labels Jan 8, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Jan 12, 2021
Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 12, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: spadgett, TheRealJon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 12, 2021

@TheRealJon: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/kubevirt-plugin 8cf6843 link /test kubevirt-plugin

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0007cb9 into openshift:master Jan 13, 2021
@TheRealJon TheRealJon deleted the CONSOLE-2371-operand branch January 22, 2021 19:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. component/core Related to console core functionality component/olm Related to OLM docs-approved Signifies that Docs has signed off on this PR kind/i18n Indicates issue or PR relates to internationalization or has content that needs to be translated lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. px-approved Signifies that Product Support has signed off on this PR qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet