New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1911474: Delete Devfile Application Group without any errors #7677
Bug 1911474: Delete Devfile Application Group without any errors #7677
Conversation
/kind bug |
@debsmita1: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1911474, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
webhookTypeObj.secretReference?.name ?? | ||
`${resource.metadata.name}-${webhookType}-webhook-secret`; | ||
const secretResource = secretList.find((secret) => secret.metadata.name === secretName); | ||
if (!_.isEmpty(secretResource)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if (!_.isEmpty(secretResource)) { | |
if (secretResource) { |
namespace: resource.metadata.namespace, | ||
}, | ||
}; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
return obj ? [...a, safeKill(SecretModel, obj)] : a; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also since here we are now getting the list of the secrets in the ns and finding if the secret we want to delete exists and then deleting it, why not use secretResource
here rather than creating another obj
?
2fe838e
to
5dc3eda
Compare
fixing the failed tc |
5dc3eda
to
72e2474
Compare
fixed |
/retest |
Verified locally, works fine for me. |
/test analyze |
/assign @rohitkrai03 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: debsmita1, divyanshiGupta, rohitkrai03 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@debsmita1: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@debsmita1: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1911474 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Fixes:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5298
Analysis / Root cause:
before deleting the webhook secret, it is not being checked if the secret exists.
Solution Description:
listing the available secrets in the namespace, and added a check to verify if the associated secret exists
GIF:
Browser conformance: