New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1913851: sort cluster task in pipeline builder #7754
Conversation
@vikram-raj: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1913851, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cc @karthikjeeyar |
const options = _.sortBy( | ||
[ | ||
...namespaceTaskList.map((task) => taskToOption(task, onNewTask)), | ||
...clusterTaskList.map((task) => taskToOption(task, onNewTask)), | ||
], | ||
(o) => o.label, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You could simply use sort function instead of lodash :)
const options = _.sortBy( | |
[ | |
...namespaceTaskList.map((task) => taskToOption(task, onNewTask)), | |
...clusterTaskList.map((task) => taskToOption(task, onNewTask)), | |
], | |
(o) => o.label, | |
const options = [ | |
...namespaceTaskList.map((task) => taskToOption(task, onNewTask)), | |
...clusterTaskList.map((task) => taskToOption(task, onNewTask)), | |
].sort((a, b) => a.label.localeCompare(b.label)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Either or. Neither is wrong.
If we want to impose such restrictions, then we should write lint rules for them. Add it to the nit pile.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Definitely my preferred way, but it's effectively the same. If we were not so swamped, I'd have gone for this change.
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: christianvogt, vikram-raj The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@vikram-raj: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1913851 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.6 |
@vikram-raj: #7754 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.7":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@vikram-raj: #7754 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.6":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Fixes:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5304
Analysis / Root cause:
Task selection dropdown in the pipeline builder contains an unsorted list of items.
Solution Description:
Sort the cluster tasks in the pipeline builder
Screen shots / Gifs for design review: