New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.6] Bug 1921603: Fix crash when loaded is true but the data set doesn't include the pods #7985
[release-4.6] Bug 1921603: Fix crash when loaded is true but the data set doesn't include the pods #7985
Conversation
@jerolimov: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1921603, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh |
@jerolimov: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1921603, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh |
@jerolimov: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1921603, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh |
@jerolimov: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1921603, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/kind bug |
/approve |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: christianvogt, jerolimov, rohitkrai03 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@jerolimov: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1921603, which is valid. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
3 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
4 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
Backend crash depends on #8025. Hold this until the other PR got merged to reduce unnecessary test loops here. /hold |
/unhold |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
3 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/hold |
#8025 is now merged, we can try to run the tests again. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
[As patch-manager] Pulling the cherry-pick-approval since the PR didn't make the merge window... sorry. Please resolve the CI problems so it can make next week's window. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@jerolimov: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@jerolimov: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1921603 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Fixes:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGSM-23911
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1921603
Analysis / Root cause:
The console components fetches two sets of data to show a DeploymentConfig (or DeamonSet or StatefulSet) with the correlated Pods. The Pod status donut was shown as soon as the data are "loaded". But in some situations the pod data are not available in this moment. This can happen if the Pod is already deleted (see PR #6689) or if the loading of the pods needs to fetch more then "one page". With the default page size this means more than 250 Pods.
In PR #6689 we fixed this already for Deployments but didn't changed this in the three similar code based for the resource types mention above.
Solution Description:
Similar to PR #6689:
Screen shots / Gifs for design review:
Nothing changed.
Unit test coverage report:
Nothing changed.
Test setup:
frontend/public/actions/k8s.ts
to 5.If you are unsure open all detail pages for all ~10 DeploymentConfigs on your local development environment.
To completely reproduce this on a shared cluster you will need more then 250 DeploymentConfigs... :-/
Browser conformance: