New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bug 1922782: Data sanity was false #7988

Merged

openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit into openshift:master from metalice:bz-1922782-added-docker-trnasport-prefix

Feb 1, 2021

Contributor

metalice commented Jan 31, 2021 •

edited by openshift-ci-robot

Signed-off-by: Matan Schatzman mschatzm@redhat.com
Fixes:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922782

Analysis / Root cause:
Data sanity was false. return value without the docker:// prefix

Solution Description:
Data sanity is now on

Before:

After:


          Data sanity was false

74d4358

Signed-off-by: Matan Schatzman <mschatzm@redhat.com>

openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-medium bugzilla/invalid-bug labels

Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 31, 2021

@metalice: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1922782, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.7.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1922782: Data sanity was false

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

1 similar comment

Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 31, 2021

@metalice: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1922782, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.7.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1922782: Data sanity was false

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot added the component/kubevirt label

openshift-ci-robot requested review from rawagner and rhrazdil

January 31, 2021 15:06

Member

yaacov commented Jan 31, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug labels

Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 31, 2021

@yaacov: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1922782, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Member

yaacov commented Jan 31, 2021

/lgtm

openshift-ci-robot assigned yaacov

Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 31, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: metalice, yaacov

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~frontend/packages/kubevirt-plugin/OWNERS~~ [yaacov]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-ci-robot added lgtm approved labels

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 31, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

12 similar comments

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 31, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 31, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 31, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 31, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 31, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 31, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 31, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 31, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 31, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 31, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 31, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 31, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 31, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 31, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 31, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 31, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Member

yaacov commented Feb 1, 2021

/retest

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 1, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

4 similar comments

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 1, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 1, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 1, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 1, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-merge-robot merged commit 486c4dd into openshift:master

Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 1, 2021

@metalice: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

openshift/console#7988

Bugzilla bug 1922782 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1922782: Data sanity was false

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

spadgett added this to the v4.7 milestone

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment