New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.8] Bug 1995118: Virtualization is not available in Home Overview #9826
[release-4.8] Bug 1995118: Virtualization is not available in Home Overview #9826
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Aviv Turgeman <aturgema@redhat.com>
/lgtm |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 1972966 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 1995118. Retitling PR to link against new bug. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: An error was encountered querying GitHub for users with public email (gouyang@redhat.com) for bug 1995118 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details. Full error message.
non-200 OK status code: 403 Forbidden body: "{\n \"documentation_url\": \"https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/rest/overview/resources-in-the-rest-api#secondary-rate-limits\",\n \"message\": \"You have exceeded a secondary rate limit. Please wait a few minutes before you try again.\"\n}\n"
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh |
@yaacov: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1995118, which is valid. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, spadgett, yaacov The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@yaacov What is the next step to proceed with this PR? Set the cherry-pick-approved label? |
@yaacov yes, wait for the cherry pick approved label at this point. We've been holding backports lately because we're trying to resolve some regressions and get a good z-stream release out, we should be starting to open things back up again this week and next. if you feel that this particular PR is absolutely critical to get merged sooner rather than later, you can ping the @patch-manager alias on coreos.slack.com in #forum-release and discuss it with them. Note that the patch manager doesn't even look at PRs until they have all the other requisite labels (valid-bz, lgtm, approved, not being "held", etc). But at this point you appear to have all the other needed labels. |
[patch-manager] 🚀 Approved for z-stream by score: 0.50 adding cherry-pick approved |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1995118 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #9686
/assign yaacov