Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1996156: show a default sidebar for resources that doesn't have sidebar #9841

Merged

Conversation

sahil143
Copy link
Contributor

@sahil143 sahil143 commented Aug 19, 2021

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the component/topology Related to topology label Aug 19, 2021
@invincibleJai
Copy link
Member

/approve

look good needed to verify once.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 20, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@rohitkrai03 rohitkrai03 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sahil143 Shouldn't the default resource details go into the details tab in the sidebar? The screenshot shows no tab in the sidebar.

@sahil143
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rohitkrai03 This was the default behavior for a resource that doesn't have a sidebar which got removed while working on the topology workload panel. ResourceOverviewPage handles this itself we don't send any information about the tab or anything.

@rohitkrai03
Copy link
Contributor

@sahil143 It feels odd to see it like that. I am okay if it was always like this but can we not put the resource overview into a details tab?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the component/core Related to console core functionality label Aug 20, 2021
@sahil143
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rohitkrai03 fixed
Screenshot 2021-08-20 at 5 18 46 PM


export const ResourceOverviewPage = connectToModel(({ kindObj, item, customActions }) => {
if (!kindObj && !item?.obj) {
return null;
}
const resourceModel = kindObj || modelFor(referenceFor(item.obj));
const ref = referenceForModel(resourceModel);
const loader = resourceOverviewPages.get(ref, () => Promise.resolve(DefaultOverviewPage));
const loader = resourceOverviewPages.get(ref, () => Promise.resolve(DefaultSideBar));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this being used anywhere else apart from topology side bar? If yes do we want to change all of that? Or we should just add the tabs logic in topology sidebar only?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not being used anywhere apart from Topology

@sahil143 sahil143 changed the title show a default sidebar for resources that doesn't have sidebar Bug 1996156: show a default sidebar for resources that doesn't have sidebar Aug 20, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@sahil143: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1996156, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1996156: show a default sidebar for resources that doesn't have sidebar

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 20, 2021
@sahil143
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 20, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@sahil143: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1996156, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (gamore@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 20, 2021
<ResourceOverviewDetails
item={item}
kindObj={kindObj}
menuActions={customActions ? [...customActions, ...menuActions] : menuActions}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you need to check for customActions again here? Its already getting added in menuActions above.

Copy link
Contributor

@rohitkrai03 rohitkrai03 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 20, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: invincibleJai, rohitkrai03, sahil143

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@sahil143: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-console c5cb01e link /test e2e-gcp-console

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 3dc403e into openshift:master Aug 21, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 21, 2021

@sahil143: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1996156 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1996156: show a default sidebar for resources that doesn't have sidebar

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.9 milestone Aug 30, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/core Related to console core functionality component/topology Related to topology lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants