New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1996156: show a default sidebar for resources that doesn't have sidebar #9841
Bug 1996156: show a default sidebar for resources that doesn't have sidebar #9841
Conversation
/approve look good needed to verify once. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sahil143 Shouldn't the default resource details go into the details tab in the sidebar? The screenshot shows no tab in the sidebar.
@rohitkrai03 This was the default behavior for a resource that doesn't have a sidebar which got removed while working on the topology workload panel. ResourceOverviewPage handles this itself we don't send any information about the tab or anything. |
@sahil143 It feels odd to see it like that. I am okay if it was always like this but can we not put the resource overview into a details tab? |
0321e30
to
ad85bf9
Compare
@rohitkrai03 fixed |
|
||
export const ResourceOverviewPage = connectToModel(({ kindObj, item, customActions }) => { | ||
if (!kindObj && !item?.obj) { | ||
return null; | ||
} | ||
const resourceModel = kindObj || modelFor(referenceFor(item.obj)); | ||
const ref = referenceForModel(resourceModel); | ||
const loader = resourceOverviewPages.get(ref, () => Promise.resolve(DefaultOverviewPage)); | ||
const loader = resourceOverviewPages.get(ref, () => Promise.resolve(DefaultSideBar)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this being used anywhere else apart from topology side bar? If yes do we want to change all of that? Or we should just add the tabs logic in topology sidebar only?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not being used anywhere apart from Topology
@sahil143: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1996156, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh |
@sahil143: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1996156, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (gamore@redhat.com), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
<ResourceOverviewDetails | ||
item={item} | ||
kindObj={kindObj} | ||
menuActions={customActions ? [...customActions, ...menuActions] : menuActions} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you need to check for customActions
again here? Its already getting added in menuActions
above.
ad85bf9
to
c5cb01e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: invincibleJai, rohitkrai03, sahil143 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@sahil143: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@sahil143: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1996156 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
fixes: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6261
Screenshot: