Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1999669: Add a wrapper around AddCapacityModal to inject StorageCluster #9938

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 5, 2021

Conversation

bipuladh
Copy link
Contributor

@bipuladh bipuladh commented Aug 31, 2021

Screenshot from 2021-08-31 13-49-36
Screenshot from 2021-08-31 13-49-30
Screenshot from 2021-08-31 13-30-59
Screenshot from 2021-08-31 19-32-17
Screenshot from 2021-08-31 13-49-36

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added component/ceph Related to ceph-storage-plugin approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Aug 31, 2021
@bipuladh bipuladh changed the title Add a wrapper around AddCapacityModal to inject StorageCluster Bug 1999669: Add a wrapper around AddCapacityModal to inject StorageCluster Aug 31, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 31, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 31, 2021

@bipuladh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1999669, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (ratamir@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

Bug 1999669: Add a wrapper around AddCapacityModal to inject StorageCluster

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 31, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 31, 2021

@bipuladh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1999669, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (ratamir@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

Bug 1999669: Add a wrapper around AddCapacityModal to inject StorageCluster

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rexagod
Copy link
Member

rexagod commented Aug 31, 2021

I think you need to run yarn run i18n on this once.

diff --git a/frontend/packages/ceph-storage-plugin/locales/en/ceph-storage-plugin.json b/frontend/packages/ceph-storage-plugin/locales/en/ceph-storage-plugin.json
index 83962a0e73..0b47eede54 100644
--- a/frontend/packages/ceph-storage-plugin/locales/en/ceph-storage-plugin.json
+++ b/frontend/packages/ceph-storage-plugin/locales/en/ceph-storage-plugin.json
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
   "{{storeType}} represents a storage target to be used as the underlying storage for the data in Multicloud Object Gateway buckets.": "{{storeType}} represents a storage target to be used as the underlying storage for the data in Multicloud Object Gateway buckets.",
   "Cancel ": "Cancel ",
   "Save": "Save",
+  "Edit Bucket Class Resources": "Edit Bucket Class Resources",
   "What is a BackingStore?": "What is a BackingStore?",
   "BackingStore represents a storage target to be used as the underlying storage for the data in Multicloud Object Gateway buckets.": "BackingStore represents a storage target to be used as the underlying storage for the data in Multicloud Object Gateway buckets.",
   "Multiple types of BackingStores are supported: asws-s3 s3-compatible google-cloud-storage azure-blob obc PVC.": "Multiple types of BackingStores are supported: asws-s3 s3-compatible google-cloud-storage azure-blob obc PVC.",
@@ -672,7 +673,6 @@
   "Selected nodes are based on the StorageClass <1>{{scName}}</1> and fulfill the stretch cluster requirements with a recommended requirement of 14 CPU and 34 GiB RAM per node.": "Selected nodes are based on the StorageClass <1>{{scName}}</1> and fulfill the stretch cluster requirements with a recommended requirement of 14 CPU and 34 GiB RAM per node.",
   "Storage": "Storage",
   "Disks": "Disks",
-  "Edit Bucket Class Resources": "Edit Bucket Class Resources",
   "Backing Store": "Backing Store",
   "Bucket Class": "Bucket Class",
   "Namespace Store": "Namespace Store",

@rexagod
Copy link
Member

rexagod commented Sep 1, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 1, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added kind/i18n Indicates issue or PR relates to internationalization or has content that needs to be translated and removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Sep 2, 2021
@rexagod
Copy link
Member

rexagod commented Sep 2, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 2, 2021
@rexagod
Copy link
Member

rexagod commented Sep 3, 2021

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 3, 2021
Add a wrapper around AddCapacityModal to inject StorageCluster
Add missing actions for various resources
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Sep 5, 2021
@SanjalKatiyar
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 5, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bipuladh, rexagod, SanjalKatiyar

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 5, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit b511d57 into openshift:master Sep 5, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 5, 2021

@bipuladh: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1999669 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1999669: Add a wrapper around AddCapacityModal to inject StorageCluster

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.9 milestone Sep 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/ceph Related to ceph-storage-plugin kind/i18n Indicates issue or PR relates to internationalization or has content that needs to be translated lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants