Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lack of fsGroup in ClusterLogging CRD. #245

Closed
DTadrzak opened this issue Feb 20, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

Lack of fsGroup in ClusterLogging CRD. #245

DTadrzak opened this issue Feb 20, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@DTadrzak
Copy link

Hey,
It looks like CRD of ClusterLogging does not allow us to define fsGroup (https://docs.openshift.com/enterprise/3.1/install_config/persistent_storage/pod_security_context.html#fsgroup).

It huge gap due to the fact that by default CSI creates volume with root as owner whereas the user used inside elasticsearch container is created with uid: 1000. It means that all clusters, deployed with storageClass provided by CSI will raise the following error:

main ERROR Unable to create file
/elasticsearch/persistent/elasticsearch/logs/elasticsearch.log java.io.IOException: Could not create directory /elasticsearch/persistent/elasticsearch/logs

due to the insufficient privileges on PV.

@ewolinetz
Copy link
Contributor

This was done by design to remove any volume specific configurations. The recommended fix for this is to create a different storageClass for Elasticsearch to use and specify that on your CR. The out of the box gp2 storageClass should work also.

@meshistern
Copy link

Hey,
I am having the same problem when i am trying to deploy ClusterLogging on azure using the azure-rwo and managed-premium storageClasses. What can i do?

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 13, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Nov 12, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants