Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

NO-JIRA: Bump CPO API budget to 4000 in EnsureApiBudget #3741

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 15, 2024
Merged

NO-JIRA: Bump CPO API budget to 4000 in EnsureApiBudget #3741

merged 1 commit into from Mar 15, 2024

Conversation

Patryk-Stefanski
Copy link
Contributor

@Patryk-Stefanski Patryk-Stefanski commented Mar 13, 2024 •
edited

Bump CPO API budget to 4000 in EnsureApiBudget

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Mar 13, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@Patryk-Stefanski: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from enxebre and sjenning March 13, 2024 11:03
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added area/testing Indicates the PR includes changes for e2e testing and removed do-not-merge/needs-area labels Mar 13, 2024
@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor

/approve
/lgtm
/retest

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 13, 2024
@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 13, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Patryk-Stefanski, sjenning

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 13, 2024
@Patryk-Stefanski
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn

@Patryk-Stefanski Patryk-Stefanski mentioned this pull request Mar 13, 2024
Closed
@Patryk-Stefanski
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 37ccc3d and 2 for PR HEAD 44a0164 in total

@Patryk-Stefanski
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 1aca50f and 1 for PR HEAD 44a0164 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD ca7fb64 and 0 for PR HEAD 44a0164 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/hold

Revision 44a0164 was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 14, 2024
@Patryk-Stefanski
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn

1 similar comment
@Patryk-Stefanski
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn

@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel
/override ci/prow/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 15, 2024
@csrwng
Copy link
Contributor

csrwng commented Mar 15, 2024

/override ci/prow/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn

@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 15, 2024

@sjenning: Overrode contexts on behalf of sjenning: ci/prow/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn

In response to this:

/hold cancel
/override ci/prow/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 15, 2024

@csrwng: Overrode contexts on behalf of csrwng: ci/prow/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Patryk-Stefanski
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 15, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 15, 2024
@Patryk-Stefanski
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 15, 2024
@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 15, 2024
@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn

@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 15, 2024

@sjenning: Overrode contexts on behalf of sjenning: ci/prow/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit fa8c0eb into openshift:release-4.15 Mar 15, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@enxebre enxebre Awaiting requested review from enxebre

@sjenning sjenning Awaiting requested review from sjenning

Assignees

@sjenning sjenning

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/testing Indicates the PR includes changes for e2e testing jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@Patryk-Stefanski @openshift-ci-robot @sjenning @csrwng