New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 2047732: [IBM]Volume is not deleted after destroy cluster #40
Conversation
Hi @sameshai. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/ok-to-test |
@sameshai: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2047732, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh |
@jsafrane: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2047732, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/hold
@sameshai was the -extra-labels argument added to a newer release of the driver? If so, can you point me to that change so we can get that pulled into the downstream fork before this PR merges? |
@dobsonj give me some time these changes are still under testing when everything is finalized, we will provide the details. |
@GunaKKIBM: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@sameshai: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
@dobsonj CSI driver is released v4.4.4. Can you pulled into the downstream fork? Followed this we can merge the operator PR |
@dobsonj can we try the rebase now with 4.4.4 |
I tried testing just the 2 rebase PR's together and it failed since it didn't have the additional RBAC permissions from this PR. So there's a bit of a circular dependency:
I'm running a build now to test all 3 PR's together (operator, driver, labeler), we'll see how that goes. |
/lgtm |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dobsonj, GunaKKIBM, sameshai The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@sameshai: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 2047732 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
No description provided.